Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk
How about freedom of speech? In Denmark the government can decide what is libel for prosecutions. Conservative politician was charged for libel for criticizing islam. And journalists were prosecuted for writing that there were no WMDs in iraq (so both political parties have been prosecuted).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_Denmark
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk
How about freedom of speech? In Denmark the government can decide what is libel for prosecutions.
|
The government? Unless the case is exceptional - as in, the offended party is essentially incapable of deciding to bring a case - no. Although libel is part of the penal code, it is up to the offended party to bring the case to court. I have been looking for the last case where the public prosecuted a libel case, couldn't find one. And there are certainly libel laws in the US as well.
You want horrible libel law, look to the UK.
Quote:
Conservative politician was charged for libel for criticizing islam.
|
Not libel, hate spech. 266b. I'll grant you that's a bad law, and I do wish Langballe (who, by the way, holds repulsive opinions, but should have the right to do so) had had the wherewithall to pursue that case further than just city court.
Quote:
And journalists were prosecuted for writing that there were no WMDs in iraq (so both political parties have been prosecuted).
|
That was a case of uncovering classified material - it wasn't the content, it was the act of disclosing materials with national security implications. And they were found not guilty.
Incidentally, there's about 10-12 political parties in Denmark, and Berlingske Tidende is very much not a left-wing paper.
This IS the country that had pretty much every newspaper print the Mohammed cartoons, something a lot of US papers haven't been quite ready to do.
Quote:
I'm a fan of our 1st amendment.
|
As well you should be, but let's not pretend it's put into effect without qualifiers. Not that I'm looking to make this a tit for tat - it's my experience (and I have lived in 3 Western countries by now) that the differences are in implementation as formed by history, not principle. A Dane can march with a poster of the PM swinging from a lamp post without a visit from the Secret Service - not that it's a worthwhile contribution in my opinion, but he can do it.
Technically, a Dane can be prosecuted for blasphemy, but it was last done in the late 1930s when a couple of early Nazis handed out fliers and a synagogue was vandalized.