Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,227 posts, read 27,597,823 times
Reputation: 16064

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveToRow View Post
People who believed a YouTube video was the cause of the Benghazi attack, even if they only believed it for a second, ARE stupid.

People that continue to defend the administration's lie that it was a YouTube video, even though it is a fact that the YouTube video had nothing to do with it, AND THE ADMINISTRATION KNEW THAT AT THE TIME, are beyond stupid. They are dishonest, rephrehensible, and have zero integrity.
agreed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,821 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
Are we so polarized as a nation that we will sit there and just say, move along, nothing to see here? Stop attacking Hillary Clinton and leave her alone so she can freely run for president, commander-in-chief? Why does Hillary Clinton deserve a pass when four Americans — Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods and Glen Doherty — were attacked, and no one came to their rescue. The lost their freedom. They lost their lives.

If they didn't get the backups and support they deserved, there was negligence, no? Very common sense stuff.
You do understand that Glen Doherty himself was part of the rescue team that came to the aid of those in Benghazi. There were other units on the way which arrived later on 9/12.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,227 posts, read 27,597,823 times
Reputation: 16064
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
You do understand that Glen Doherty himself was part of the rescue team that came to the aid of those in Benghazi. There were other units on the way which arrived later on 9/12.
i have made many posts in this thread, and my posts have absolutely nothing to do with Glen Doherty. If you would like to answer some of the questions I have, please do so. Otherwise, kindly move on.

No, they didn't get the proper backups or supports they DESERVED.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,821 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
According to the men who were their in Benghazi, one getting his arm almost blown off from the mortars, and were serving as advisers on the movie's set, the movie is as accurate as they remember it to be. So, no, it's not fiction.
According to some of the men in Benghazi. Others who were there disagree/dispute the accuracy of the book/movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,821 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
i have made many posts in this thread, and my posts have absolutely nothing to do with Glen Doherty. If you would like to answer some of the questions I have, please do so. Otherwise, kindly move on.

No, they didn't get the proper backups or supports they DESERVED.
I apologize for providing you with answers to your questions which you don't like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,227 posts, read 27,597,823 times
Reputation: 16064
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
I apologize for providing you with answers to your questions which you don't like.
No, you didn't answer any of my questions, but thanks anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:31 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,073,833 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveToRow View Post
Get back to me when you're standing over your son's coffin and the Secretary of State feeds you that lie as the reason he's dead.
Yeah, the families of 4,000+ dead soldiers feel the same way. But we haven't had nine+ investigations for all of those sons and daughters, even though there were more than 900 lies told that brought those soldiers back to the United States in body bags. Which makes the total hypocricy of this statement evident:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveToRow View Post
I'm not sure who disgusts me more, Hillary or otherwise-normal appearing people who defend this crap. People like you.
Right back at you, pal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:48 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,953,334 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Yeah, the families of 4,000+ dead soldiers feel the same way. But we haven't had nine+ investigations for all of those sons and daughters, even though there were more than 900 lies told that brought those soldiers back to the United States in body bags. Which makes the total hypocricy of this statement evident:



Right back at you, pal.
We don't need an investigation like the one you're fantasizing over because the Bush administration admitted there was faulty intelligence prior to the Iraq war.

The goon squad you elected twice has never been so transparent or forthcoming, or honest about anything. This administration's modus operandi is to lie and obfuscate. When that doesn't work, they try and change the topic, which is of course exactly what you've attempted to do in the above post.

Also, as a veteran I know the families of some of those 4,000+ soldiers who died. They do NOT feel the same way. President Bush is overwhelmingly appreciated, admired and respected by military personnel and their families. The same is not true of Obama or Hillary.

What's your basis for commenting on what military personnel think? None, I'm sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 01:58 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,073,833 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveToRow View Post
We don't need an investigation like the one you're fantasizing over because the Bush administration admitted there was faulty intelligence prior to the Iraq war.

The goon squad you elected twice has never been so transparent or forthcoming, or honest about anything. This administration's modus operandi is to lie and obfuscate. When that doesn't work, they try and change the topic, which is of course exactly what you've attempted to do in the above post.

Also, as a veteran I know the families of some of those 4,000+ soldiers who died. They do NOT feel the same way. President Bush is overwhelmingly appreciated, admired and respected by military personnel and their families. The same is not true of Obama or Hillary.

What's your basis for commenting on what military personnel think? None, I'm sure.
Oh, please. You want Clinton to be prosecuted over talking points, but give the previous administration a pat on the back and say, "Hey, no problem, we'll just call the hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed you presided over a result of "faulty intelligence," instead of calling it what it really was, which were outright lies.

But yeah, let's go after changing talking points, because that's the real crime here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2016, 02:04 PM
 
12,039 posts, read 6,568,955 times
Reputation: 13981
The Obama administration which includes SOS and the heads of security versus the soldiers who were on the ground in the battle are telling two different stories.
One group is lying.
It really comes down to who had the motivation to lie-- The Obama administration who already had lied and deceived us on the videos, wanted to maintain their story for the election that terrorism was now minimal, and had blown over 600 requests for increased security -- or the heroes that were there on the ground risking their lives with no motivation to lie?

Who do you believe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top