Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The CO2 levels noted in the Nature article were 2000 ppm!! Are you calling NATURE a "conspiracy blog"???? I guess your supreme knowledge (with no scientific degrees or publications) gives you the credibility to call one of the premier scientific journals in the world a "conspiracy blog"?
2000 ppm????That is 5X what it is today!
1. Now if CO2 is a terrible green house gas, as you say, why was the planet not BOILING then???
2. Why didn't temperatures fall during the Great Depression when man-made CO2 production fell dramatically?
3. Why didn't temperatures rise during and after WW2 when man-made CO2 INCREASED dramatically?
4. Why were the temps during the time of the Roman Empire warmer than now?
5. How could there be tropical fossilized plants and animals above the artic circle if man made CO2 is the main "culprit" in raising temps?
6. Why do CO2 levels rise AFTER any change in temp, rather than vice-versa?
Wake up- Your cult cannot be explained, like most cults. The "faithful" in cults stick to the beliefs of their religion, despite evidence which refutes thier faith.
Right. But what about all greenhouse gases? You know.... methane, sox, nox, and co2?
Whether it's the IRS, NOAA or any other organization, Democrats and Progressives support hiding the truth, lying, cheating anything to support the lies they like. It's sad they have this religious fervor to hide facts, honesty, truth, and scientific advancement. Very similar to some religious zealots of the 15th-17th century.
"Whether it's the IRS, NOAA or any other organization, Democrats and Progressives support hiding the truth, lying, cheating anything to support the lies they like".
As Edward Snowden found out the current Administration is the least transparent and biggest lying Administration to date. If the evidence was presented during the Bush Administration I would have not been surprised but coming from Obama I found it quite unbelievable
11-02-2015, 06:02 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
So they have all the scientific information available, they have the reasoning behind the adjustments but now they want the employees internal emails turned over, and here we thought they wanted the scientific data.
It's a quote mining expedition they're on. They'll cherry pick bits and pieces, remove all context, and use it to claim some massive conspiracy. We know this because the anti-science crowd has a long history of doing exactly that.
Congress has filed a subpoena to investigate manipulation of global temperature data in a recent "study". In contrast to other areas of academics and science, both organizations have refused to release the methods of collection and the raw data to Congress.
Cults always attempt to hide facts and conceal inconsistencies with thier agenda. Science is open to any questioning and further investigation.
How much is this investigation going to cost US taxpayers?
Then it was probably from some conspiracy blog or right wing fossil fuel funded 'think-tank'.
Yes, it's a waste of time posting anything like that. Not sure why you bothered the first time. I seem to remember you making some fake claim about doing 'research' for a 'paper' for 'college' but were unable to post the essay question or your Reference list. And all you mentioned were conspiracy blogs and a right wing 'think tank' propaganda piece. Not a Journal paper in sight. Didn't you claim you got an A+ or something?
I did a research paper and got an A. I decided to mostly stay off these threads after I posted a link to NASA recently stating that Antarctic ice had increased every year since 1982 and a mod deleted it. If the mods are going to protect you, this forum is a waste of time.
It's a quote mining expedition they're on. They'll cherry pick bits and pieces, remove all context, and use it to claim some massive conspiracy. We know this because the anti-science crowd has a long history of doing exactly that.
Cherry picking?
...sorta like the climate scientists do with data when they want to show runaway warming instead of conducting blind impartial science.
I did a research paper and got an A. I decided to mostly stay off these threads after I posted a link to NASA recently stating that Antarctic ice had increased every year since 1982 and a mod deleted it. If the mods are going to protect you, this forum is a waste of time.
How did you establish that the Antarctic ice was increasing each year since 1982, where did you get the data?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
