Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2015, 07:44 PM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,727,979 times
Reputation: 9985

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
I agree. works for me. That is my point exactly actually. What religion has anything to do with employment? Honestly speaking?
Then these Muslims should not have been rewarded based on their religion because they signed up with a general trucking company who hauled anything they were contracted to haul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2015, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,190 posts, read 27,570,476 times
Reputation: 16036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruzhany View Post
Then these Muslims should not have been rewarded based on their religion because they signed up with a general trucking company who hauled anything they were contracted to haul.
huh? I never said they should be rewarded. It is disturbing that they got the reward. lol $240,000 is absolutely excessive in a civil lawsuit like this when real damage couldn't be proven.

If you can't do the job, find another employment. I hope after this clear statement, nobody thought the reward should be given simply because someone couldn't do the job. =O
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2015, 07:53 PM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,727,979 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
huh? I never said they should be rewarded. It is disturbing that they got the award. lol $240,000 is absolutely excessive in a civil lawsuit like this when real damage couldn't be proven.

If you can't do the job, find another employment. I hope after this clear statement, nobody thought the reward should be given simply because someone couldn't do the job. =O
Didn't say you did. They should have been awarded "0".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2015, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,190 posts, read 27,570,476 times
Reputation: 16036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruzhany View Post
Didn't say you did. They should have been awarded "0".
I agree. To me, it is not a case of discrimination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2015, 08:06 PM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,727,979 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
I agree. To me, it is not a case of discrimination.
Hey look! We agreed on something. G'nite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2015, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,190 posts, read 27,570,476 times
Reputation: 16036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruzhany View Post
Hey look! We agreed on something. G'nite.
nite
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2015, 09:08 AM
 
2,015 posts, read 1,646,991 times
Reputation: 2826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
There were $8.7M in awards in 2014 based on religion, I imagine there a few awards other than Muslims. By the way religious discrimination in hiring is also an offense. Do you feel the same way about Christians bringing charges?

Thanks to Jacqueg for the link on EEO stats

Religion-Based Charges
Yes You can believe in what ever you want to but when you go into the work force you have to leave you religious biases at home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2015, 09:11 AM
 
4,095 posts, read 2,563,727 times
Reputation: 3973
This case exposed the double standards of the Obama Admin and his Leftist ilk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2015, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,733,041 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by golimar View Post
This case exposed the double standards of the Obama Admin and his Leftist ilk.
How so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2015, 10:56 AM
 
4,078 posts, read 2,337,412 times
Reputation: 1395
So let me get this straight. Two Muslims who get fired for refusing to do something that went against their religion and personal beliefs are awarded $240k, while a Christian baker who refused to do something that goes against his religion and personal beliefs gets fined, loses his business, threatened with jail time and gets death threats? This country gets more ****ed up by the day because of PC, liberal pieces of ****. I cannot wait until someone with common sense gets back in the White House and all these liberals are kicked out of office and replaced for good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top