Quote:
Originally Posted by jertheber
As long as society only exists in terms of right-left politics I suppose we will most likely fail on many economic fronts. A thought regarding the present, with respect to the how's of an ever increasing human labor replacement technology, I'd say the prospects for those now enjoying the fruits of their labor seems pretty promising. And for those in there future whose labor will have little practical application potential, life could very easily become intolerable without a national agreement on what will possibly be our biggest concern, aside from the hype of all the fun stuff technology brings.
|
the national agreement will still be the middle class paying on behalf of the rich for the poor. It will not be the Google rich paying for it. The Republicans represent industrial wealth, whereas the Democrats represent post-industrial wealth. It is in both parties interest to keep the poor poor, and keep the immigrants coming.
It is only through self-perpetuating poverty and broken families that politicians can get votes based on selfish interests, necessity, or anger. It is only through a divided society that both parties can harvest from it and take what enriches them.
I sense that sometime in the last 30 years, the Democratic Party changed. You can correct me on this. The Democratic Party began to see poverty not as a problem to solve, but a source of political popularity. They realized that they have lots to gain and little to lose if they do the following:
1. Open the gates of immigration (poor colored people vote Democratic, poor whites are useless)
2. Encourage multiculturalism (thus, producing the anticipated social divisions.
3. Complicit in sending jobs overseas and cultivating poverty at home.
4. Tolerate a culture of single motherhood and broken families.
All these reduce labor cost, increase life stress, pit one group against another. It is their divisions that will sustain the "left." All the social justice rhetoric is disingenuous and fake.