A political movement is not a private club where you can look through a slit, recognize people you don't like, and deny them admission. No, you can't "kick people out" of the conservative movement or any other kind of mass movement - what you
can do is disclaim and disown them, on the grounds that their racial beliefs are contrary to conservative principles. To the extent this has been used it's already dissuaded out-and-out white supremacists from having much to do with the movement.
This is also a problem hardly exclusive to conservatives - let's not forget that the widely-accepted racial ideology and language of the left these days is ripped off of
critical race theory, which in turn stems from the analysis of out-and-out communists. It's funny how liberals are never pressured to disown them despite their fellow travelers having an even higher body count than the Nazis*. This is where the "white privilege" and "white supremacy" garbage comes from, and stems from the Marxist belief that ideas and culture are superstructures for the reality of class interests. Thus to the left saying right-wingers are "straight white men" is an argument** - dismissing one's beliefs on account of race and sex seems really racist and sexist to me, and making that the strategy of an entire political party in an effort to get non-whites and women as captive votebanks (on the model of black voters) is at least as racist as the "Southern strategy". But these decoders of white privilege have redefined racism as being synonymous with whiteness, and their idea of "privilege" is being treated like a mundane human being rather than a racial stereotype - kind of like the privileges one gets in prison, and it wouldn't be a stretch for the same logic to eventually be used to think of the continued existence of white people as a privilege. With the anti-liberal logic of state command and control and their denial of individuality in favor of all being "socially constructed" (see
gender theory for some of that garbage) they could very easily get to the point where they believe the collective (i.e. the state) is the fount of all existence and thus genocide is a legitimate means of building social justice. Given that in October 2013 all pro-government echelons including Democratic Congressional leadership and the White House were
calling the opposition "terrorists" or implying such just for effectively opposing Obama in Congress, and "terrorist" in our society is a form of dehumanization (stage 4 of
the 10-stage genocidal process), and that the opposition is heavily associated with white Southerners (who already face definite prejudice and discrimination) and white men, such a scenario is possible even if it is extremely unlikely***. If mass killings do come to America, in any event I'm almost certain it would primarily be in the form of political group genocide, not racial group genocide.
Come on, you have to admit that all this is at least as likely as white-supremacist Social Darwinism becoming the dominant ideology, as a lot of liberals seem to fear. Competition and success being reasons for killing the weak and instituting social injustice is about as likely as social justice, progress, and white privilege being reasons for genocide and totalitarianism.
EDIT: Also bear in mind the unending drooling we see from Democrats over "changing demographics", i.e. there being less white people as a percentage of the population and the prospect of Democrats being able to outbreed their opponents. Imagine if an array of states were getting whiter and Republicans constantly salivated over "changing demographics" giving them perpetual domination - everyone would be all over them in a second with accusations of racism (because they're as obsessed about demography as the crowd on Stormfront!) and plotting to establish white supremacy, because why else would they be drooling so much over how much the white population is increasing? I mean, if all the votes they get are from white people and all they can do is outbreed their opponents then they must be an exclusionary whites-only party, right? Of course doing the same thing with people of color is totally different and not exclusionary at all
.
*Nazi Germany killed 21 million, compared to 77 million for China and 62 million for Soviet Russia, so the communist body count is vastly higher. As a percentage of population per year, however, the Nazis were deadlier than either Russia or China. In this area Khmer Rouge Cambodia (another communist country) probably takes the all-time grand prize, managing to kill off a quarter of its population in four years; even the Congo Free State, likely by far the worst 19th century regime, took twenty years to kill off half of its people even if the highest guesses of the death toll are correct.
**A mischievous person might wonder if "white male" is a sort of code for "bourgeois"
. If so, then
perhaps white women are the new kulaks?
***If nothing else the threat of civil war will keep all but the craziest from striking out at the masses. There's a much greater chance that someone somewhere in this country will try for mass killings if/when rougher times settle in, but the chances of success are nil. I don't buy into conspiracy theories that white genocide is happening now - peaceable migration of peoples and the ceasing of prejudice against minority groups is not genocide in any meaningful sense. Forced assimilation can be genocidal, but I don't think busing and Obama-era public housing plans (the only things that have ever fit this category) are remotely destructive enough to qualify. Zimbabwe, on the other hand, is perhaps the only country where white genocide actually happened, but the whites' circumstances and history there were quite different from anywhere else except South Africa.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I understand you dislike "Christians", but many do admire Christ. I think the world would be better off without fake Christians, but the world would be a MUCH BETTER PLACE if everybody acts like Christ.