Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
lol - I never thought I'd say this, but I'm beginning to miss 9/11. What happened to if we don't go on about our lives, the terrorists win?
Exactly, I have plans for going out to breakfast and seeing a movie later, and I plan on doing both regardless of any threats.....though the movie might not happen if I get too tired and need a nap later.
Exactly, I have plans for going out to breakfast and seeing a movie later, and I plan on doing both regardless of any threats.....though the movie might not happen if I get too tired and need a nap later.
Good for you because you should have every freedom in the world to make your decision however you want to.
But this is not what the thread is all about. The thread is about "Should government announce it?"
So every time your mall made an announcement, did you not go to the mall?
what's that suppose to mean? I will make the decision however I want to make the decision. It is the mall's damn responsibility to announce it. Don't you think?
Again, this thread is NOT about "how would you make the decision, what is your response?" this thread is about "Should government announce it."
I will still go to Germany and France, but after France's attack, Travel warning raised for France and Belgium. It is the government's responsibility to announce the threat.
what's that suppose to mean? I will make the decision however I want to make the decision. It is the mall's damn responsibility to announce it. Don't you think?
Again, this thread is NOT about "how would you make the decision, what is your response?" this thread is about "Should government announce it."
No, I don't think it is the mall's responsible to announce any warning, it is their responsibility to alert the authorities and have every warning fully investigated to prevent anything from happening.
So no, it isn't a concern of mine for the government to announce warnings because all they do is fuel fear in people.
No, I don't think it is the mall's responsible to announce any warning, it is their responsibility to alert the authorities and have every warning fully investigated to prevent anything from happening.
So no, it isn't a concern of mine for the government to announce warnings because all they do is fuel fear in people.
well, I guess we just have to agree to disagree then. I am with the mall.
what's that suppose to mean? I will make the decision however I want to make the decision. It is the mall's damn responsibility to announce it. Don't you think?
Again, this thread is NOT about "how would you make the decision, what is your response?" this thread is about "Should government announce it."
I will still go to Germany and France, but after France's attack, Travel warning raised for France and Belgium. It is the government's responsibility to announce the threat.
Here is why the government should not announce it.
"UPDATE: Anonymous Twitter account disavows earlier announcement about ISIS attack on Sunday.
*Update: The FBI says the plot to attack the wrestling event in Atlanta is not credible."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
