Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-28-2015, 08:56 PM
 
34,258 posts, read 19,233,697 times
Reputation: 17237

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by meow667 View Post
What policy was Dear trying to influence? What conduct? How was he intimidating our population? How was he coercing our population?
well I think most people will be a little afraid of going to planned parenthood.

Im kind of in awe that you even ask.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2015, 08:57 PM
 
18,325 posts, read 18,913,187 times
Reputation: 15631
Quote:
Originally Posted by meow667 View Post
Why not? Do you disagree that what Allen did involved acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State and appeared to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population and occurred primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States?
allen was involved with gang activity and violence which is applicable to your quote up until the words intimidate and coerce a "civilian population". gang violence is not aimed at the "civilian population", it is aimed at other members of rival gangs. the civilian population does not apply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 08:58 PM
 
18,325 posts, read 18,913,187 times
Reputation: 15631
Quote:
Originally Posted by meow667 View Post
What policy was Dear trying to influence? What conduct? How was he intimidating our population? How was he coercing our population?
seriously? think about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:00 PM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,115,404 times
Reputation: 14056
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
The more fascinating question to me is why so many news outlets ARENT referring to it as domestic terrorism.
Exactly. Multiple news sources saying that Dear, when arrested, said "no more baby parts." That's a fairly obvious clue his motivation is pro-life anti-abortion. If his motivation is indeed abortion, then he's using violence to try to influence public policy, and therefore meets the definition of "terrorist" that helenejen posted.

This is playing out the same way as Dylann Roof when he killed 9 people in Charleston. His motive was anti-black hatred, spurred on the by white supremacist group he belonged to. His attack used methods identical to that of the Paris terrorists, yet the media also refused to correctly label Roof as a terrorist, instead brushing him off as merely "mentally ill."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:04 PM
 
138 posts, read 93,165 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
allen was involved with gang activity and violence which is applicable to your quote up until the words intimidate and coerce a "civilian population". gang violence is not aimed at the "civilian population", it is aimed at other members of rival gangs. the civilian population does not apply.
You bring up a very good point! What is a "civilian"? I have been hearing Mr. Dear killed one police officer and two "civilians". Wasn't Mr. Swasey a civilian? He was employed by the University of Colorado and was being paid to do a job. Does that mean that other people who work for the University of Colorado are not civilians? How does someone being a gang member exempt them from being a civilian? Isn't a civilian someone who lives in a civilized society? Aren't we all civilians? Where and how do you draw a mythical line separating civilians from non-civilians?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:04 PM
 
34,258 posts, read 19,233,697 times
Reputation: 17237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Exactly. Multiple news sources saying that Dear, when arrested, said "no more baby parts." That's a fairly obvious clue his motivation is pro-life anti-abortion. If his motivation is indeed abortion, then he's using violence to try to influence public policy, and therefore meets the definition of "terrorist" that helenejen posted.

This is playing out the same way as Dylann Roof when he killed 9 people in Charleston. His motive was anti-black hatred, spurred on the by white supremacist group he belonged to. His attack used methods identical to that of the Paris terrorists, yet the media also refused to correctly label Roof as a terrorist, instead brushing him off as merely "mentally ill."
The no more baby parts is not as applicable as you think. He said a LOT of things apparently, he also mentioned President Barack Obama in multiple statements. The guy may be suffering from Obama Derangement syndrome. At this point its appropriate to label it domestic terrorism, as it appears that way. As we learn more it may change to just being a crazy guy.

Maybe its just a extreme case of Obama Derangement Syndrome. I wonder what his CD handle was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Transition Island
1,679 posts, read 2,535,013 times
Reputation: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
So much for worrying about Syrian refugees, we've got our own domestic right-wing terrorists as it is. This is an act of terrorism. There is no other word for it. Killing people when the motive is political ideology is terrorism, and it's not just limited to radical Muslims. And yet the mainstream media will not use the word "terrorist" to describe this American shooter...
This is exactly why they hate us! A Terrorist is a terrorist no matter what skin color they are or religion they are affiliated with in this world. Consider it to be something else when it is the male color of the majority here in America. Doomsday is upon us! Keep making it fit their agenda. Time is running out!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,576,050 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by meow667 View Post
OK. Do you believe that the actions of either Mr. Dear or Mr. Allen met those criteria, and if so, why? If you believe that one or both didn't meet the criteria, could you state your reasons for reaching that conclusion as well?
Given the Patriot Act definition, the label of domestic terrorism comes down to intention. What was Dear's motive? What was Allen's motive? Can you answer either of these questions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:12 PM
 
138 posts, read 93,165 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
This is playing out the same way as Dylann Roof when he killed 9 people in Charleston. His motive was anti-black hatred, spurred on the by white supremacist group he belonged to.
What group was that? I don't recall him being part of any group, he was a lone nut that went off the deep end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2015, 09:13 PM
 
138 posts, read 93,165 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
Given the Patriot Act definition, the label of domestic terrorism comes down to motive. What was Dear's motive? What was Allen's motive? Can you answer either of these questions?
We don't know the motive of either. Do you know Dear's motive? The Colorado Springs Police Department says that they don't know. Are you going to believe them or what some media pundit assumes was his motive? Maybe he didn't have a motive. Maybe he didn't take his meds yesterday. Why jump to conclusions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top