Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-30-2015, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GW5K View Post
It would seem you consider this attack to be justified. Can you clarify?




Well, if you did a little reading instead of trying to create straw men, you would already know that the police officer in the photo was a church pastor and very much opposed the senseless killing and organ harvesting that goes on at planned parenthood.


He didn`t need to be there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:06 PM
 
15,532 posts, read 10,507,413 times
Reputation: 15813
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodmockingbird View Post
This guy was all over the map. So far, we have some -- but not conclusive -- allegations that he:

* Spoke in a disorganized multi-topic non-sequitur and incomprehensible manner

He's all over the socio-political landscape. And decompensated in isolation.

I for one fully expect that some sort of rambling manifesto will emerge, but I could be wrong.
I'm glad you posted everything that we know, thanks. The bolded allegation speaks volumes. "Spoke in a disorganized multi-topic non-sequitur and incomprehensible manner". In other words, thought disorder. Which is associated with schizophrenia, psychosis, mania, delirium and so on. If that particular allegation is true, the psychiatric community is going to have a field day with this guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jburress View Post
The evidence that has been released so far points to him acting on his religious beliefs. If he believes himself to be a Christian, it matters not one iota that you claim he isn't. AFAIK, you're not in charge of deciding who is a Christian and who isn't.
Correct, I am not in charge, Christ is, and He says: By their fruits you shall know them.

I do not care what people call themselves because their actions define them. If I called myself Chinese, would that mean I am Chinese (although I am not)? If you told me you are the president of Mexico, should I believe it just because you said so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:25 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,545,982 times
Reputation: 6392
He is also a pothead living in CO.

Pothead leftists would prefer to ignore this fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma USA
1,194 posts, read 1,100,649 times
Reputation: 4419
By far the greater issue will be whether he was an undiagnosed, decompensated schizophrenic who lacked the ability to understand the illegality and immorality of his actions, or whether he was a "cranky old coot" who just decided to make himself judge, jury, executioner,

OR 'judge, jury, executioner' AND wielder of some righteous sword that will -- by his actions -- cause people to quake in fear of his ( or 'His' ) retribution, and thus alter their beliefs and/or behavior?

Rather than just two categories, there are three.

* Out of touch, mentally ill, unable to tell right from wrong

* Belligerent, and perhaps mentally ill, but marginally functional guy who knew what he was doing and did it because he just plain wanted to.

* Cunning, thoughtful, perhaps mentally ill, and undertook his actions with the belief and motive to influence others through fear.

Laymen will often conclude that anyone targeting a person or organization that is highly charged in political or religious turmoil or conflict is automatically a "terrorist".

There is a higher legal standard for establishing "terrorism" in a crime, than there is for "bat-dung crazy belligerent, violent taking the law in your own nutjob hands" type crime.

The "middle" category is by far the most fascinating, makes us reflect most intently upon our society and our jurisprudence.

Probably every one of us has run across the "bat-dung crazy, marginally functional" type. They abound. Most aren't all that violent, or even totally nonviolent. This one wasn't... until one day in November.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,277,178 times
Reputation: 45168
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Very sad...even worse when you consider that once the dust settles, they`ll go right back to aborting babies and selling baby parts to the highest bidder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meow667 View Post
Does this mean that you support the harvesting of baby parts for sale by PP? It must be too much to hope that even the less rabid pro-abortionists would have a problem with PP profiting from that "market".
PP never sold fetal tissue for a profit. To continue to insist it did shows a failure to understand that the modest charge used was to cover the cost of handling and shipping the tissue, which was donated by the woman having the abortion, not sold by PP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:41 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,078,154 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
PP never sold fetal tissue for a profit. To continue to insist it did shows a failure to understand that the modest charge used was to cover the cost of handling and shipping the tissue, which was donated by the woman having the abortion, not sold by PP.
They're not "misunderstanding" anything. They're simply refusing to acknowledge it because it doesn't fit their agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Its a choice. Whether or not you want to tone it down after you see people get killed is a choice. There is no law saying you need to tone it down, and no one is suggesting there should be such laws. There is NO NEED to refrain from calling people retards, or using the "N" word, or calling gays with the "F" word, but most people choose to not use those words.
And not only do most people avoid using those words themselves - they don't respect people who *do* use those words.

Which is one of the many reasons why I am such an adamant supporter of free speech. It is so useful to me when someone voluntarily reveals who they *really* are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
But of course people have no problem with BLM trashing towns and inciting all kinds of violence. Your really pathetic double standard makes your comments worth a bucket of warm spit.
Yes, hateful rhetoric of any source incites violence just as your post acknowledges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 02:23 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,037,809 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Yes, hateful rhetoric of any source incites violence just as your post acknowledges.
Then pardon us if we take offense to you selectively caring about only certain types.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top