Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have been seeing and hearing of a growing upset at the enviromental stewardship of California during the Brown Administration. An executive order stopping persual of "gross polluters" if the car is owned by an illegal alien. Encouraging hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to move to CA during a severe drought and now add to that Syrian refugees. And the topper, Brown using un-reimbused state labor to see if his ancestral family land is suitable for fracking. And all the Democrats tell the large enviromental contingent in this state is: HA HA, what are you going to do, vote Republican? Nice to see some public protest to the anti-enviromental policies of the Democratic/Brown administration.
Who ever believed that most California Liberals were sheeple in the first place?
The observers who watched Nancy Pelosi voted back into a new term by a clueless California progressive left electorate, over Cindy Sheehan by a landslide.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 23 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6039
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm4
The observers who watched Nancy Pelosi voted back into a new term by a clueless California progressive left electorate, over Cindy Sheehan by a landslide.
So, you think the liberals in California are clueless because they did not vote for someone who is to the left of Nancy Pelosi ???????????????????????????????????????????????
Well, at least i know this is about principle and not ideology.
The observers who watched Nancy Pelosi voted back into a new term by a clueless California progressive left electorate, over Cindy Sheehan by a landslide.
Really? Now why should Californians toss out a powerful member of congress and replace her with a backbencher who would likely vote no differently than Pelosi, except that she's have far LESS power than Pelosi has?
That's dumb as hell. That's like a pro basketball player tossing his Jordan's for a pair of Chuck's. It's senseless.
If these observers are right, then ANY electorate that reelected an incumbent qualify as sheeple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside
Most of the country.
Most of the country is stupid. So i guess i shouldn't be surprised.
Really? Now why should Californians toss out a powerful member of congress and replace her with a backbencher who would likely vote no differently than Pelosi, except that she's have far LESS power than Pelosi has?
That's dumb as hell. That's like a pro basketball player tossing his Jordan's for a pair of Chuck's. It's senseless.
If these observers are right, then ANY electorate that reelected an incumbent qualify as sheeple.
Most of the country is stupid. So i guess i shouldn't be surprised.
Because Nancy and her husband own "businesses" where the majority of the labor is illegal. The rest? No unions for Nancy!
Because Nancy and her husband tried to circumvent environmental policies when it came to the golf course they are "partners" in.
This isn't "new" news. It's just never been mainstream liberal media news, so the liberal sheeple don't wanna believe it.
But you are correct, just one more corrupt CA politician would take her place.
Gotta love the stupid in CA and the sheeple liberals who keep voting for them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.