Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
And how did that happen? What made them illegal?


Did the shooter buy those guns?

What is very easily? Please tell us.....

Whenever I order anything gun related on line that very first thing that comes up is "if you live in CA" we cannot ship this.....

So, your failure is noted..
I already stated they purchased them legally, they altered them to fire in the fully automatic mode and accept large capacity magazines and the clips could be detached easily.


Surely you agree that the weapons used should be banned.

 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:47 PM
 
3,038 posts, read 2,414,353 times
Reputation: 3765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I already stated they purchased them legally, they altered them to fire in the fully automatic mode and accept large capacity magazines and the clips could be detached easily.


Surely you agree that the weapons used should be banned.
The AR15 is the most popular rifle in the country. I own 2 most gun owners own at least 1. Why would I want to ban my own home defense rifle? Because it scares you?

I highly doubt they were converted to full auto. Any and all semi auto firearms could be converted to full auto cheap, does that mean they should all be banned?
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Converted to what? A lamp? An ashtray? Please be specific. A link supporting your assertions would certainly be helpful as well. My assertion is that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Surely you have seen the news reports, even WSJ.
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,937,526 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Surely you have seen the news reports, even WSJ.
Actually, no I haven't. I work in the boondocks and don't have the luxury of a television or a newspaper. So will you answer my question?
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:52 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpm1 View Post
How is it ok to deny a person travel but allow them access to the internet or telephone from which they could be recruiting on?

How about this. Subjecting fundamental rights to executive fiat is a terrible idea and is downright stalinist
Exactly. Don't like the very ugly road many in this country foolishly want our society to travel.
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:53 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
Now that the "You are Safe" speech is over - news will soon be released about the Money Trail for the Financing of the Radical Islamic Terrorists that massacred 14 in California.
ISIS indicated they were not responsible, who knows but the way ISIS is transferring and earning money will be addressed.
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly. Don't like the very ugly road many in this country foolishly want our society to travel.
Secret lists and an AG ready to arrest anyone dissing Muslims.

Great country we have here wouldn't you say ?
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:56 PM
 
3,038 posts, read 2,414,353 times
Reputation: 3765
Tell me more?

"Unfortunately, we've found that the government's new redress process falls far short of constitutional requirements because it denies our clients meaningful notice, evidence, and a hearing. The government had an opportunity to come up with a fair process but failed, so we're challenging it in court again."
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,937,526 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
ISIS indicated they were not responsible, who knows but the way ISIS is transferring and earning money will be addressed.
We've been at this for how long? It hasn't been addressed yet. Furthermore, it won't be.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top