Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Certainly not! Because we all know that non-Muslims are just as likely to instigate a terror attack as Mulsims are.
In any other era in American history, someone like Donald Trump would win in a landslide. Sorry that so many of you have been brainwashed to think that putting your country first is "hate speech."
Shogo Watanabe, a lawyer who has been helping refugees seek asylum for years, says the biggest problem is that Japan's immigration policy geared toward keeping people out.
"The immigration bureau's main focus is to prevent undesirable foreigners from entering the country," he said. "So accepting refugees is contrary to their main mission. They have little motivation to accept outsiders."
Shouldn't that be the main focus of any immigration bureau?
Certainly not! Because we all know that non-Muslims are just as likely to instigate a terror attack as Mulsims are.
In any other era in American history, someone like Donald Trump would win in a landslide. Sorry that so many of you have been brainwashed to think that putting your country first is "hate speech."
Your article speaks of political asylum and says Japan has only had 22,000 applicants in almost 30 years.
And the very individual in your link who got asylum in Japan is Muslim.
Did you read your link before you posted it ?
As for Trump, name a President who was "like Trump" ?
as for japan, a huge part of the reason is because japan has very strict limits on the number of muslims that are allowed into the country. sounds like someone suggested that for this country, and people excoriated him for it, now who was that? obama? no. rubio? no. clinton? no. hmmm, trump? why yes, yes it was. something to think about isnt it?
Islamic terrorist attacks is just the tip of the iceberg. I don't care if there never is any more attacks which there will continue to increasingly be. I am so sick of seeing the ugliest Muslim faces in their offense muslim costumes over populating America. They're only here for welfare and economic opportunities and turn America into a caliphate. They don't really want to be here for any other reason and Americans don't want them here either. Our rogue government is allowing it against our will.
Wherever there are Muslims there is terror. From Wiki:
Many media and scholarly accounts of terrorism in contemporary China focus on incidents of violence committed in Xinjiang, as well as on the Chinese government's counter-terrorism campaign in those regions.[6] There is no unified Uyghur ideology, but Pan-Turkism, Uyghur nationalism, and Islamism have all attracted segments of the Uyghur population.[7][8] Pan-Turkism manifested in the early 20th century, in opposition to Yang Zengxin's rule. Chinese promotion of atheism during the early years of the PRC reinforced the Islamic beliefs of the Uyghurs, which were further heightened when the political liberalization of the 1980s allowed Uyghurs to interact with Muslims in the Gulf region and Central Asia.[8] Recent incidents include the 1992 Urumqi bombings,[9] the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings,[7] the 2010 Aksu bombing,[10] the 2011 Hotan attack,[11]2011 Kashgar attacks[12] and the 2014 Ürümqi attack.[13] Some scholars have also characterized political campaigns under Mao Zedong as a form of state terrorism.[14
China has terror attacks because it already has a sizable muslim population. Japan has only had one that I know of and that was a domestic terrorist back in the 90s.
China supresses the outside press and has their own government run news, they are better than Russia but not much. If there was a terrror attack who knows if it would make the news, this French journalist is being expelled because of a report on what the government concluded was a terror attack.
Quote:
In the immediate aftermath of the Paris attacks, Chinese officials released details about a deadly attack at a coal mine in Xinjiang. China called it a coordinated terrorist attack; Gauthier's report suggested otherwise. What happened in Paris and what happened at the coal mine attacked had "nothing in common," she wrote.
The incident in Xinjiang was "an explosion of local rage," Gauthier said. "Pushed to the limit, a small group of Uighurs armed with cleavers set upon a coal mine and its Han Chinese workers, probably in revenge for an abuse, an injustice or an expropriation."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
