Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Reminds me of the folks here who were convinced that Neil deGrasse Tyson wasn't a real astronomer because he was a doctor of philosophy, not a doctor of science...
Seems like there are a surprising number of people who don't understand academic titles.
I am a lawyer. Not a single one of my law school professors had a PhD, only JDs and a couple of LLM, which despite being a masters degree is a program you complete after you have your JD, at least in the US.
And unlike other fields of academia, many law professors are hired based on their experience in the courtroom, in a federal agency, etc. rather than on how much they've published. There are some that focus on academic scholarship and publications, but it's a real mix between those and the ones with practical experience but little/no publications.
I was a young naive voter, so I went with it. Now that I look back, how can he be a professor without holding a PhD or even authoring a paper in a peer review journal. Obama wasn't a profeasor. He was an instructor without tenure. The Democrats really knew how to sell the "professor" CV.
Honestly, that's your fault. You can't blame anyone but yourself.
Also somewhat curious about the date. I'm the same age as Obama and I finished grad school in 1986. WTF was Obama doing between 1983 when he should have graduated undergrad from Columbia and the late 1980s when he entered Harvard Law?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.