Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2015, 12:33 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,980,650 times
Reputation: 7502

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
I hope that one day it'll be that damn Libertarian kicking the crap out of both the Ds and Rs. Rarely are any of us better off with the other side. It's time to move to the true middle, with people who actually care about the citizens and their rights.

If I could rep you 1,000 times for this comment I would!!!! Yes we need to flush these corrupt, authoritarian, out of both parties like the turds that they are, and get folks in office that will respect our individual rights, liberties, as well as respect and adhere to the Constitution! Not to mention get rid of the corporate cronyism as well, because what we have now sure as hell isn't capitalism! Again...well said!


WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Last edited by CaseyB; 12-22-2015 at 02:26 PM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2015, 01:08 PM
 
4,983 posts, read 3,288,750 times
Reputation: 2739
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
If I could rep you 1,000 times for this comment I would!!!! Yes we need to flush these corrupt, authoritarian, out of both parties like the turds that they are, and get folks in office that will respect our individual rights, liberties, as well as respect and adhere to the Constitution! Not to mention get rid of the corporate cronyism as well, because what we have now sure as hell isn't capitalism! Again...well said!


WAKE UP PEOPLE!
The people are awake and individual liberties is not what they vote for.

Last edited by CaseyB; 12-22-2015 at 02:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 01:20 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,980,650 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
The people are awake and individual liberties is not what they vote for.

I guess if you really want to go that angle, then in a sense you would be correct. Too bad people are all too willing to give up their individual liberties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma83 View Post
Only a democrat is this dumb. You want to "crack down" on the 2nd amendment so you refuse to recognize CCP from 25 states....
Constitutionally, no State or Commonwealth is required to recognize the laws of other States, excepting under certain special conditions, namely property rights and criminal law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,733,041 times
Reputation: 15482
Well, as the story says ..."Under the policy, Virginians with a history of stalking, drug dealing or inpatient mental-health treatment cannot obtain a permit in a state with comparatively lax laws and carry a handgun legally at home."

So I can only conclude that the posters here who are deploring this decision support allowing stalkers, drug dealers, and in-patient sufferers from mental disease to carry concealed weapons in Virginia, in contravention of laws legislated by Virginia's citizens.

Is that correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 02:17 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,210,815 times
Reputation: 12102
When it comes to guns, liberals take leave of "common sense".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 02:19 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,550,144 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Well, as the story says ..."Under the policy, Virginians with a history of stalking, drug dealing or inpatient mental-health treatment cannot obtain a permit in a state with comparatively lax laws and carry a handgun legally at home."

So I can only conclude that the posters here who are deploring this decision support allowing stalkers, drug dealers, and in-patient sufferers from mental disease to carry concealed weapons in Virginia, in contravention of laws legislated by Virginia's citizens.

Is that correct?
Yes, you are correct. You're also correct if you can assume that the other posters didn't bother to read the story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,270,543 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by 16 Acres View Post
Well, it's not "quite" as bad as first figured.

Here is some info on a quick search:

---"Virginia law lists 20 conditions that would disqualify a person from being issued a concealed carry handgun permit. They include anyone in the United States illegally, subject to a protection from abuse order, or convicted of various criminal charges from drunken driving to assault and battery.

People convicted of a felony, domestic abusers, those adjudicated mentally ill or incompetent, recently convicted drunk drivers and dishonorably discharged military personnel are among those determined by the Virginia General Assembly to be ineligible to lawfully conceal handguns."---
Pretty much all of those conditions federally prohibit people from possessing firearms. So even if someone had a CCP they'd be in violation of federal law possessing one if they have a disqualifying condition (a CCP doesn't permit someone to violate Federal law). If you can't legally buy a gun from an FFL, you can't legally possess a gun irrespective of whether or not you hold a current Concealed Carry license.

Illegal aliens are already prohibited, anyone who is convicted of domestic violence, or subject of a DVRO are prohibited, anyone convicted of a felony or any offense with a maximum sentence (regardless of sentence given) of over 12 months in prison is already prohibited, anyone adjudicated mentally incompetent is prohibited (ironically Seung-Hui Cho was just such a person and was legally able to buy firearms in Virginia because the State failed to abide by Federal regulations and notify the FBI of the result of his incompetency hearing), anyone dishonorably discharged from the military is prohibited.

The one suspect is drunk driving, however I'd bet you dollars to donuts somewhere in the detail that's a Virginia analog of felony DUI/DWI (not first time DUI/DWI, or someone injured of killed while the driver was in that state), which would make the person already prohibited.

It's a do nothing law, except for impacting people who could previously legally carry concealed in Virginia under their state reciprocity.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The Rules • Infractions & Deletions • Who's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 02:30 PM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,115,170 times
Reputation: 8471
Just made a scathing phone call to Herring's office. 804-786-2071.
As expected they don't answer, and hide behind voicemail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,782,455 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by 16 Acres View Post
What's funny is that most of Virginia is Red. If it were by Land, the Democrats would had lost big time. What the problem is, is the DC people crossing over the bridges at night to go "home". There just ain't enough land in DC or enough decent neighborhoods to keep them there and the real Virginia gets the shaft. It's not just Virginia though, as other states have this problem.
Yea, being a conservative in SoCal is proof that a person can be an island.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
The people are awake and individual liberties is not what they vote for.
Proof of low information voters filling the ranks of both sides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top