Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:17 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,713,056 times
Reputation: 12943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If there was a wild fire and you thought by starting a burn back to it would save your home, would you?

Yes, what they did is accepted responses to a fire. Why is this so difficult to understand

You think you are being clever but in reality you are being ignorant.
You are completely misstating the case. Someone else posted the trial and the his own family testified that he passed out the matches in order to cover up poaching. They've had their trial. And now these guys want the government to give them federal land?

Tell you what - I think the Olympic National Park is gorgeous and I'd like to have it. Should we go occupy one of the visitors centers until they give it to me? Because seriously, I would like to have it please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:20 PM
 
497 posts, read 428,268 times
Reputation: 584
There is evidence, 4 separate witnesses in fact, testifying to their motivation for maliciously lighting a fire on federal land. This is why they were charged and convicted of Arson. You seem to be conveniently ignoring this fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Without evidence, yes the judge must ignore that. It's how our justice system works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,286 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15644
Originally the group was going to leave because they indicated neither the Hammonds or the town wanted them there, now that just changed. They are moving some NPS equipment to block the roads and the FBI has issued 5 warrants for arrest. Looks like they are going to get their wish.


One of them is a Mormon and the Mormon Church just issued a statement regarding these extremists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:25 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,713,056 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Originally the group was going to leave because they indicated neither the Hammonds or the town wanted them there, now that just changed. They are moving some NPS equipment to block the roads and the FBI has issued 5 warrants for arrest. Looks like they are going to get their wish.
Oh they need to be arrested and put in prison for a long time. Give the prosecutors ten minutes and I'm sure they can come up with a list of charges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:28 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
You are completely misstating the case. Someone else posted the trial and the his own family testified that he passed out the matches in order to cover up poaching. They've had their trial. And now these guys want the government to give them federal land?
Well no, the father and son have turned themselves in to serve the rest of their time.

I'm not misstating anything. I'm discussing what they were found guilty of doing.

Quote:
Tell you what - I think the Olympic National Park is gorgeous and I'd like to have it. Should we go occupy one of the visitors centers until they give it to me? Because seriously, I would like to have it please.
People wanted to get home when BLM blocked the streets also. Sometimes protest ain't pretty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:30 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by OscarTheGrouch View Post
There is evidence, 4 separate witnesses in fact, testifying to their motivation for maliciously lighting a fire on federal land. This is why they were charged and convicted of Arson. You seem to be conveniently ignoring this fact.
I'm ignoring nothing. They were found guilty of starting fires not poaching. Did they unlawfully kill animals? I have no idea but its not what they were found guilty of doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:33 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,713,056 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Well no, the father and son have turned themselves in to serve the rest of their time.

I'm not misstating anything. I'm discussing what they were found guilty of doing.

People wanted to get home when BLM blocked the streets also. Sometimes protest ain't pretty.
Witnesses told the court they started the fire to cover up the poaching. Even their own family testified. Not sure why you are trying to make them sound innocent.

Do you seriously think the government is going to start doling out federal lands to their pals? This will not turn out well for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:34 PM
 
497 posts, read 428,268 times
Reputation: 584
They were not charged with poaching, so they can't be found guilty of it. However they were charged and convicted of, and again I quote 'maliciously lighting fires on federal land'. This was not a controlled burn on their land that got out of control, but a case of malicious arson. You seem incapable of acknowledging this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'm ignoring nothing. They were found guilty of starting fires not poaching. Did they unlawfully kill animals? I have no idea but its not what they were found guilty of doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:35 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,097,165 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by OscarTheGrouch View Post
There is evidence, 4 separate witnesses in fact, testifying to their motivation for maliciously lighting a fire on federal land. This is why they were charged and convicted of Arson. You seem to be conveniently ignoring this fact.

If there was any credible evidence that they maliciously set a fire to cover up poaching, the judge would not have ignored minimum sentence, and given one of them 3 months, and the other 1 year. There were in fact many character references presented in the trail attesting to the positive contributions that the Hammonds have may to the community. Again, there doesn't seem to be any credible evidence that the Hammonds maliciously set a fire to cover up poaching.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2016, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,286 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Oh they need to be arrested and put in prison for a long time. Give the prosecutors ten minutes and I'm sure they can come up with a list of charges.
After all this time I still don't know what they want, what is the point of their protest as the Hammonds are still going to jail and the local people don't want them nor does the sheriff. Might have been better sealing off the road and leaving them there all winter.


Weird because some of the media is trying to interview some of these nuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top