Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:30 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,505 times
Reputation: 1863

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rorqual View Post
So does the 2nd Amendment state that you should walk around Target and other public spaces with an assault rifle hanging by your ever expanding waistline?
The second amendment doesn't say what you should do. It says what the government can't do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:35 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by rorqual View Post
So does the 2nd Amendment state that you should walk around Target and other public spaces with an assault rifle hanging by your ever expanding waistline?
first off the second amendment puts restrictions on the GOVERNMENT not the people. it means that the government cannot make laws to restrict the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:38 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,505 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
And how many of these so called "good guys with guns" stopped mass shootings
1. Most every mass shooting has occurred in gun free zones. So law abiding licensed to carry citizens are not armed where these shootings occur.
2. Licensed to carry citizens are not cops and have no obligation to intervene, especially if the circumstances are not optimal. Unless I have a clean shot, I'm not going to make myself a target any more than I already am.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:42 PM
 
32,065 posts, read 15,067,783 times
Reputation: 13688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlandochuck1 View Post
1. Most every mass shooting has occurred in gun free zones. So law abiding licensed to carry citizens are not armed where these shootings occur.
2. Licensed to carry citizens are not cops and have no obligation to intervene, especially if the circumstances are not optimal. Unless I have a clean shot, I'm not going to make myself a target any more than I already am.


I don't blame you. But all I keep hearing is that if everyone had a gun they would take out these mass shooters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,937,526 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
[/b]

I don't blame you. But all I keep hearing is that if everyone had a gun they would take out these mass shooters.
Take the Aurora shooting as an example.. How many people were in that theater? Chances are, there were several in there that had a concealed permit, but because it was a gun free zone, they couldn't bring their gun in. There is no guarantee that someone would have had a clean shot and no guarantee that the shooter would have been stopped, but because it was a gun free zone, he was guaranteed to not be stopped until LE arrived.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:55 PM
 
32,065 posts, read 15,067,783 times
Reputation: 13688
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Take the Aurora shooting as an example.. How many people were in that theater? Chances are, there were several in there that had a concealed permit, but because it was a gun free zone, they couldn't bring their gun in. There is no guarantee that someone would have had a clean shot and no guarantee that the shooter would have been stopped, but because it was a gun free zone, he was guaranteed to not be stopped until LE arrived.
Of course they could because theaters don't have metal detectors and people aren't searched. Honestly, do you think everyone follows these laws or any laws they can get away with. And with this particular case I don't think anyone could have helped....too dark, too crowded
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 09:55 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,505 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
[/b]

I don't blame you. But all I keep hearing is that if everyone had a gun they would take out these mass shooters.
Gun free zones are very attractive to mass shooters. If several people were carrying, there is a chance the the damage could be mitigated.
You don't hear much about shootings that would have been classified as mass shootings, but the shooter was shot before they shot enough people to be considered "mass" shootings.

Last edited by Orlandochuck1; 01-02-2016 at 10:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,937,526 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Of course they could because theaters don't have metal detectors and people aren't searched. Honestly, do you think everyone follows these laws or any laws they can get away with. And with this particular case I don't think anyone could have helped....too dark, too crowded
People that have their concealed carry permit, know the law and obey the laws of their state as they are applicable. It's not something you want to give up because you took a gun where you aren't supposed to have it. I see the proper signage, I turn around and walk away. Others stow their firearm in their vehicle until they leave. It is taken serious. As for how much light there was and how much of a crowd, you don't know what a person could or couldn't see. Your pupils dilate in extremely dark areas. Perhaps nobody would have had a shot, but we will never know now will we? All we know is how many were killed. We will never know if perhaps even one could have been saved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 10:07 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,505 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Of course they could because theaters don't have metal detectors and people aren't searched. Honestly, do you think everyone follows these laws or any laws they can get away with. And with this particular case I don't think anyone could have helped....too dark, too crowded
Actually CCWs have been found to be much more law abiding than the average individual.
Photoed, fingerprinted, thoroughly background checked, paid fees, attended classes and passed firearm proficiency tests, then waited for weeks or sometimes even months to get, we don't want to jeopardize our licenses.
If you check with the FBI, you will find that seldom are CCW licenses revoked because of law infractions.
Licenses are immediately revoked if you are charged with felonies and some misdemeanors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2016, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
I'm an nra life member and tend to think that generalized open carry is a dumb idea. if you're going fishing at Kenai w/ bears about fine, open carry your .454 casull. But if you're going to the public library on Saturday morning, it is not too much trouble to ccw. I am a small guy, 5'7" 130 lbs, and can conceal my glock 19 under t shirt and shorts.

Open carry in an urban library, grocery store, etc is the equivalent of a gay rights activist wearing crothchless chaps. Hey, look at me!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top