Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's odd that Obama came up with this executive order late in his 2nd term, and not during the first term, which tells me it's his way of getting even with the pro-Second Amendment voters who demolished the Democratic party in the 2014 mid-term elections.
Given everything he has done in the last 7 years, the guy has no common sense and he isn't willing to listen to the American people.
Why should he listen to us. He's the smartest guy there is, doncha know?
It's odd that Obama came up with this executive order late in his 2nd term, and not during the first term, which tells me it's his way of getting even with the pro-Second Amendment voters who demolished the Democratic party in the 2014 mid-term elections.
Given everything he has done in the last 7 years, the guy has no common sense and he isn't willing to listen to the American people.
It's a given that TeamObama doesn't give a flip about what the American people want OR the LAW.
It could be "pay-back", he is known for his Stompy-Foot Tantrums and sneer.
It's more likely to be a Standard Operating Procedure "Distraction" from his release of 17 Gitmo Prisoners - while it gives him a great excuse to hop on Air Force One for a "tour" so he can bloviate and probably work in some Fund Raising.
Between 2001 - 2013, 400,000+ American died from firearms on US soil. A little less than 50% died due to homicides. During the same time, less than 4000 died due to terrorism. It is obvious that your fellow Americans are very dangerous people. Obama has it right, there needs to be gun control. No one is taking your gun. What he is trying to do is to prevent people with mental illness and unlawful issues from owning a gun and then slaughtering Americans. Isn't it ironic that a certain segment of us are sh*t scared of terrorists, yet those that they should be really concern about are fellow Americans.
Executive Action is constitutional.
ok, name one, just one, gun control law that would, short of 100% confiscation, stop ANY shooting in the country, just one.
as for executive action, is it constitutional, AS LONG AS, it does not make new law.
As long as they're not writing new law or refusing to enforce laws we have, then I'm okay with EO's.
Yeah, right up to the time Executive Orders are used to suspend or modify Free Speech, Free Assembly, Free Religion and such.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW
These directives to the Executive bureaucracy are within the President's rights as chief executive. These are concerning the enforcement of the existing law and do not create any new law. Some of these changes may inconvenience some potential gun buyers but they are within existing law.
Show us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer
USA Today....
" In the United States in 2010, the rate of firearm deaths was 10 people per 100,000, while for traffic accidents it was 12 per 100,000. Firearm-related deaths totaled 31,672 in 2010."
According tothe CDC there are roughly 10k firearm deaths a year. 13 x 10k = an estimate of 130K from firearm deaths not 400K.
You didn't seriously expect gun control nutters to provide accurate data, did you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke
Congress not acting is an act.
They don't want to do anything and that is a reflection of America on this.
The audacity of this President is beyond stupefying.
On a more positive note, Executive Orders can be rescinded by other presidents.
We'll have to wait to see if a Republican president does exactly that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.