Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
they should put a ban after 2 kids , some leechers have 5-6 on goverment support, rewarding the behavior!
have many as u want at least you can afford them
"They" should put a ban on people writing posts when they do not know how to spell, capitalize, or use punctuation correctly.
Last edited by MoonBeam33; 01-07-2016 at 09:58 PM..
If State governments didn't work so hard at making access to abortion and family planning so difficult for poor people, there probably wouldn't be so many kids.
Sorry, this is a peeve of mine. That is not a loophole, its tax law. It was designed this way.
I was going to use quotation marks around it because I actually agree with you, however I forgot.
It just blows my mind that when Romney ran for president and released his taxes that his effective tax rate was so low. Even then we paid a higher rate than him and in the last four years we've actually moved up another bracket. That just seems incredibly backwards to me.
I was going to use quotation marks around it because I actually agree with you, however I forgot.
It just blows my mind that when Romney ran for president and released his taxes that his effective tax rate was so low. Even then we paid a higher rate than him and in the last four years we've actually moved up another bracket. That just seems incredibly backwards to me.
they should put a ban after 2 kids , some leechers have 5-6 on goverment support, rewarding the behavior!
have many as u want at least you can afford them
Ok.....
Now, if only people would stop impeding abortions. That would be the very first and basic step yet people can't even agree upon that!
Something should be done about failing schools also.
Something should be done about the failing parents. If parents were actually being good parents, their children could excel in any school system. Teachers shouldn't have to coax students into wanting to learn. That's the job of the parents because ultimately the parents are supposed to be their children's role model not their best friend or favorite play buddy.
Who cares what you think... opinions are like... well, you know the saying. Your analysis of the issue is uninformed. Most poor people I know only have a few kids, or none at all. In fact it's a myth that poor people are having a lot of children at the expense of others.
If only there were some other country that has restricted the number of offspring a family is allowed, then we could examine how well it has worked out for them...oh, wait...
What does that have to do with essentially paying poor people to have more kids?
Nobody here is saying to restrict the amount of children one can have, we're just saying you won't be rewarded by it.
they should put a ban after 2 kids , some leechers have 5-6 on goverment support, rewarding the behavior!
have many as u want at least you can afford them
So we should assume you are/are planning to claim 0 dependents on your tax filings, right?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
