Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Flint, MI residents pay their water bills?
Yes 8 8.00%
No 92 92.00%
Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2016, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,807,239 times
Reputation: 10789

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
The GOP and its Governors are bad news. Pushing more and more debt on later generations.
In this case, to save money, the Governor of MI and his cronies pushed learning disabilities and stunted growth on the children and their children! Health Impacts of Lead Poisoning

Can't put a price on the damage caused by the recklessness and ignorance of these "leaders"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2016, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,851,014 times
Reputation: 4585
I think this says it all re. "Good" Republican leadership ....

General Motors shutting off Flint River water at engine plant over corrosion worries | MLive.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 07:19 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,035,628 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Write your congress person to authorize the EPA to do what you would like them to do, keep our waterways safe.
The lead is not in the water source, it's from the pipes....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 07:28 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,608,641 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by maf763 View Post
So you want the federal government to take control over state and local matters.

I have no clue how you got that out my asking the Progressives(you), where was their great EPA?
False sense of security.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,807,239 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The lead is not in the water source, it's from the pipes....
You will be pleasantly surprised that the EPA is happy to educate states on ALL sources of water contamination, including pipes.Table of Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants | Your Drinking Water | US EPA

The EPA would help to enforce clean drinking water at state and local levels so that we don't have another crisis such as in MI due to sheer ignorance of those who have power (emergency managers appointed by governor). But the GOP passed a bill taking away authority of the EPA to assist with this.

Quote:
in May 2015 when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its final version of the Clean Water Rule, “the agency cheered the broad reach of the rule, arguing that it would protect the drinking water of some 117 million Americans, or roughly a third of the population.”

But then along came Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), who promptly introduced a resolution to kill the EPA’s Clean Water Rule that was passed in November.
Quote:
the safety of drinking water and stream health are threatened because of weak state and local regulation and a lack of enforcement. The rule is meant to make it clearer which waterways the EPA and the Corps of Engineers can oversee under the 43-year-old Clean Water Act, which covers “navigable waters” such as the Mississippi River and Lake Erie, but is vague on how far upstream protections must go to keep those water bodies clean.
After Poisoning Entire City With Lead, Republicans Swiftly Vote To Gut Clean Water Rule


Since you obviously have expressed frustration the the EPA could not help prevent this, write your congress person about your dissatisfaction with their killing of the "Clean Water Rule!"

http://www.epa.gov/cleanwaterrule
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,807,239 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
I have no clue how you got that out my asking the Progressives(you), where was their great EPA?
False sense of security.....
The EPA was hobbled by the GOP. See above post ^^^^^^

How many more children do you want rendered learning disabled due to lack of competency at state and local levels?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 09:45 AM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,867,411 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The lead is not in the water source, it's from the pipes....
C'mon, say it!

Solder joints.

New copper pipe with silver solder joints for Flint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 09:47 AM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,867,411 times
Reputation: 2144
Let the mass chelations begin!

Cher is only about appearances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 09:48 AM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,336,207 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperthetic View Post
C'mon, say it!

Solder joints.

New copper pipes with silver solder joints for Flint.
It will be PVC.......blue brute.

We helped replace miles of it in Midland county......Michigan.

No solder.........it is "Sure Lock".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 09:57 AM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,867,411 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
It will be PVC.......blue brute.

We helped replace miles of it in Midland county......Michigan.

No solder.........it is "Sure Lock".
"We know enough about the health effects of PVC and dioxin exposure to act now. The
federal Center for Disease Control found children have the highest levels of DEHP in their
bodies, which is a known developmental and reproductive toxin. [CDC] Dioxin causes a wide
array of health problems in both animals and humans, and is a known human carcinogen.
According to EPA, the levels of dioxin-like compounds found in the general population may
cause a lifetime cancer risk as high as one in every 1,000 people, which is 1,000 times higher
than EPA’s generally “acceptable” risk level of one in a million people. Dioxin also can
compromise the reproductive, developmental, immune, and endocrine systems in both animals
and humans. In children, dioxin exposure has been associated with IQ deficits, delays in
psychomotor and neurodevelopment, and altered behavior including hyperactivity. [NTP &
IARC] (See Dioxin Brochure.)"

http://www.ussafety.com/media_vault/...1264894110.pdf

Copper and silver are natural safe antibiotics.

Lead is an unsafe antibiotic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top