Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For those interested I made a thread RE: new proposals for AZ as the Legislative Session just began here: This particular bill is listed as
Quote:
5. SB 1054: Would make it a crime for someone w/n 20 feet of a Police Officer to knowingly videotape any law enforcement activity without the officer's explicit permission. The bill also gives officers the ability to force someone to stop recording law enforcement activity on their own property if police determine it is interfering with their work or the area is unsafe. John Kavanagh R-Fountain Hills
The thing with Arizona is that we have a whole crackpot of lunatics that vote here and vote en masse. They love this crap to the detriment of our public perception.
You and some posters here twist the story into something else altogether. I'm sure it was intentional.
If you think you can interfere with an officer during an arrest by entering the officer's space, you are looking for big trouble. When an officer tells people to get back during a takedown, he is issuing a lawful order.
You and some posters here twist the story into something else altogether. I'm sure it was intentional.
If you think you can interfere with an officer during an arrest by entering the officer's space, you are looking for big trouble. When an officer tells people to get back during a takedown, he is issuing a lawful order.
You and some posters here twist the story into something else altogether. I'm sure it was intentional.
If you think you can interfere with an officer during an arrest by entering the officer's space, you are looking for big trouble. When an officer tells people to get back during a takedown, he is issuing a lawful order.
Like I keep saying... Conservatives LOVE authoritarianism. They play lip service to the ideas of being against it, but give them the opportunity, and they'll legalize it.
You and some posters here twist the story into something else altogether. I'm sure it was intentional.
If you think you can interfere with an officer during an arrest by entering the officer's space, you are looking for big trouble. When an officer tells people to get back during a takedown, he is issuing a lawful order.
That is already the case so another law is needed why?
That is already the case so another law is needed why?
Pandering. It's always like that with Kavanagh. He represents an area very popular with Snowbirds and Retired Folks from the Midwest amongst other places.
That is already the case so another law is needed why?
Already asked. See post #15 for a detailed explanation
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
