Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No it wasn't. Hourly wages have always been market driven. Then came socialist inspired policies that deny the reality of supply and demand. Now do you understand,
Yes lets listen to that economic tool who thought bailouts work. yes he knows what's best for others.
I wonder what this flip flopping fraud will say next week?
The poorest in society have been sabotaged for far too long. A major increase in minimum wage is going and needs to happen soon.
I get it. You want to help. Instead of forcing others to pay what you think is reasonable allow individuals to decide for themselves.
Want to close the gap between the haves and the have nots? Get rid of the war on drugs and fight crony capitalism.
Yep, minimum wage was always intended to be a living wage!
No it wasn't!
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
I'm probably more right-leaning than left leaning, but the GOP is just crazy on this topic. From their side of the aisle, you hear crazy talk about abolishing minimum wage altogether. And suggesting that the minimum wage should be raised? That's treason! No GOP candidate could survive making such a suggestion!
Anyone who is for forced wages is a big government supporter all the way. How's that been working out?
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
Mitt was always a lot more politically neutral than anyone gave him credit for and this is just one example of it.
LMAO He's a big government freak all the way. The difference between him and the dems is he has an R by his name. At least the dems are up front about it. you know what's coming. Spend and get government involved in running our daily lives for his causes. Neutral? pffft
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
What needed to happen decades ago: A minimum living wage needed to be figured out, set in place and then permanently tied to inflation and the cost of living. If we'd done that in the 50's or 60's we wouldn't constantly be arguing about it today.
Of course we would. You want to have the Central planners, who are known economic failures, to be in charge of that? When are you going to learn?
If you want to stop inflation, how about we stop government from printing money and spending beyond their means? That's a start.
I agree with him. I really do not comprehend the GOP's utter contempt for raising the minimum wage.
Well, you'd have to understand the Economics behind it.
And then there's the constitutionality of it.
When he felt the time was ripe,
President Roosevelt asked
Secretary of Labor Perkins,
'What happened to that
nice unconstitutional bill
you had tucked away?'
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
Yep, minimum wage was always intended to be a living wage!
Define "living wage" objectively in no uncertain terms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
What needed to happen decades ago: A minimum living wage needed to be figured out, set in place and then permanently tied to inflation and the cost of living.
The purpose of Demand-pull Inflation is to protect and conserve resources.
Indexing minimum wage would turn the US into a 2nd World State.
Willard is a politician, he knows what to say to get votes.
Apparently he doesn't. Maybe he is not a very good politician.
Why would he say it now unless it is a business opinion? What office is he running for?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.