Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:12 PM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,226,166 times
Reputation: 6665

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Cut spending. problem solved.

It's as simple as this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:25 PM
 
30,059 posts, read 18,655,134 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
Tax cuts are spending.


Only if one presumes (as most liberals do) that the income of Americans is first owned by the federal gvernment, not the citizen.

To a liberal, taxes are a balanced percentage of how much the government LETS YOU KEEP.

To a conservative, taxes are the percentage which the government TAKES FROM YOU.

It is, in a nutshell, the marked difference between liberals and conservatives. Liberals believe that the government is in a better position to make decisions about your personal finances and life. A conservative beleives that they are better served to determine how to run the personal and financial affairs of thier own life.

Want to be a slave? Vote democrat. Liberals complain the most about 'income inequality", yet liberal policy has been the greatest contributing factor to that issue. Democrat policy is designed to create more dependent, poor people, and thus more democrats. Most people, on the other hand, want to be free and financially secure, putting the interests of citizens diametrically opposed to the goals of liberals/democrats.

Witness the liberal enclaves around the US in which there is MASSIVE income inequality: NYC, DC, San Fran, LA, Philly, Baltimore, New Orleans, and Detroit. Liberals have created modern feudal serf systems in these towns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,731,520 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
Tax cuts are spending.
???? You need to take economics 101.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:31 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,556,365 times
Reputation: 2207
Government owns the people today.

That's the fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Texas
3,251 posts, read 2,551,521 times
Reputation: 3127
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post


Only if one presumes (as most liberals do) that the income of Americans is first owned by the federal gvernment, not the citizen.

To a liberal, taxes are a balanced percentage of how much the government LETS YOU KEEP.

To a conservative, taxes are the percentage which the government TAKES FROM YOU.

It is, in a nutshell, the marked difference between liberals and conservatives. Liberals believe that the government is in a better position to make decisions about your personal finances and life. A conservative beleives that they are better served to determine how to run the personal and financial affairs of thier own life.

Want to be a slave? Vote democrat. Liberals complain the most about 'income inequality", yet liberal policy has been the greatest contributing factor to that issue. Democrat policy is designed to create more dependent, poor people, and thus more democrats. Most people, on the other hand, want to be free and financially secure, putting the interests of citizens diametrically opposed to the goals of liberals/democrats.

Witness the liberal enclaves around the US in which there is MASSIVE income inequality: NYC, DC, San Fran, LA, Philly, Baltimore, New Orleans, and Detroit. Liberals have created modern feudal serf systems in these towns.

You're going to have to cite some evidence to make that kind of claim. And I believe you're oversimplifying a fundamental difference between urban and rural communities. And by your logic, the most conservative states and least taxed communities should have the wealthiest citizens, we know that's not true. It's way more complex than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:41 PM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Cut spending. problem solved.
They didn't. They increased spending. Problem back on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:51 PM
 
30,059 posts, read 18,655,134 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesesteak Cravings View Post
You're going to have to cite some evidence to make that kind of claim. And I believe you're oversimplifying a fundamental difference between urban and rural communities. And by your logic, the most conservative states and least taxed communities should have the wealthiest citizens, we know that's not true. It's way more complex than that.
Really?

So why is it that the most prosperous cities in the US are conservative and the poorest are liberal cities?

Perhaps it is not "more complex" than that at all. Is it just a conicidence that generations of liberal government have created some of the poorest, least functional cities in the US?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,854,786 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesesteak Cravings View Post
Would make more sense to me to continue to pay down the deficit before we lower taxes.
And by cutting spending you lower the deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,854,786 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
They didn't. They increased spending. Problem back on.
They couldn't have. Ryan said they wouldn't, well except for defense spending. But we don't spend very much on that already, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 03:34 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,558 posts, read 17,263,106 times
Reputation: 37268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesesteak Cravings View Post
Can anyone dispute this? What happened to the deficit hawks from the republican party?.........
Romney lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top