Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From an E-mail exchange, between the Oregon Governor and Valarie Jarrett, the Presidents advisor.
Quote:
""We cannot let people we do not like and they, not liking us, run around armed. We have got to set an example, or this could get out of hand. Look what happened down at the Bundy Ranch. Once it warms up, more people will come. - Valarie Jarrett ""
And there are rules that come along with using that land. If you don't want to follow those rules, then don't cry and whine when you get in trouble.
PS, the feds are not restricted to owning only bases.
Unless they amended the Constitution, They are to own Washington DC. Naval ports and military installations. There is no other provision we the people gave them authority to "own"
It is outlined in the Constitution, what "real property" the US Government is allowed to "own" or occupy
Sounds like good advice. Setting a precedence that sufficient firepower grants you criminal immunity is bad.
The government already knows this and uses it well..... Welcome to the Police State, of America.....
Did this man that died, after being oppressed by government:
Kill anyone, or suspected, or accused of such?
Steal from anyone, or suspected, or accused of such?
Threaten to kill or harm anyone, with proof of such, or just being accused of such?
Transporting or himself, have a warrant for their arrest, issued by a judge at the time of altercation with oppression by other organized men with intent of harm, in an ambush?
The right to protest, means no government can force you to leave.
Your civil rights are not granted to you by government.
Not even when demanded that you leave.
Protesting private property has it's limits with trespass, but public property is free to have at it, as long as no harm or destruction of the surrounding private property takes place...
Business goes on as usual, until someone is harmed......
As seen over and over with our own government.......
When the talking isn't getting the results you desire, there is bloodshed.
Unless they amended the Constitution, They are to own Washington DC. Naval ports and military installations. There is no other provision we the people gave them authority to "own"
It is outlined in the Constitution, what "real property" the US Government is allowed to "own" or occupy
Sure is.
Quote:
The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State
The Supreme Court ruling you're looking for is probably Light v. United States - 1911.
Unless they amended the Constitution, They are to own Washington DC. Naval ports and military installations. There is no other provision we the people gave them authority to "own"
It is outlined in the Constitution, what "real property" the US Government is allowed to "own" or occupy
Quote:
The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State
Much of that property was owned by the federal government before the individual states were formed. The Nevada constitution states that all undistributed public lands would be retained by the federal government and could never be taxed by the state.
The government already knows this and uses it well....
Ever since the Whiskey Rebellion, in fact.
Quote:
Did this man that died, after being oppressed by government:
Kill anyone, or suspected, or accused of such?
Steal from anyone, or suspected, or accused of such?
Threaten to kill or harm anyone, with proof of such, or just being accused of such?
Transporting or himself, have a warrant for their arrest, issued by a judge at the time of altercation with oppression by other organized men with intent of harm, in an ambush?
Sounds like Sovereign Citizen gobbledygook.
Finicum died because he reached for weapon while confronting armed police officers. Sad, bur perfectly preventable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
