Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2016, 03:48 PM
 
27,145 posts, read 15,322,979 times
Reputation: 12072

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That'll come back to bite Bernie in the butt.




Good point.
Bernie tried to divert attention from a serious matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2016, 03:53 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,561 posts, read 17,232,713 times
Reputation: 17602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The Obama administration has confirmed for the first time that Hillary stored 'top secret' documents on her unsecured personal server.

As has also been well documented, former high ranking Obama officials such as Secretary of Defense Robert Gates have publicly stated that the Chinese and the Russians almost assuredly hacked that server and whatever information was on it.

This is the Obama administration confirming this. If this woman is not indicted for her crimes, then the only explanation will be that Barack Obama and his administration are thoroughly corrupt.
amen to that conclusion!


when the head of the DOJ can falsify a warrant and shop judges until he finds one that will sign off to spy on a journalist...and then sufffer no legal consequences...all faith is lost in the administration and its federal agencies. Weaponizing federal agencies is the stuff of obama's administration and banana republics.


Whe the head of the seante can lie about Mitt to throw an election and suffer no leagl or ethical consequences, you know you live in a banana republic headed by a lying sack of dirt.


Only hope Hillary has some dirt on obama. Seems the two have a death grip on each other. Who can survive the most damage in what will be a pyhrric victory for one or the other. Probably the faultless and selectively responsible moral trainwreck named obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
4,761 posts, read 7,837,223 times
Reputation: 5328
It was an online order confirmation for KY and a few Rabbit "toys". Nothing to see here. Hillary would never compromise national security. Never.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,347,425 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The Obama administration has confirmed for the first time that Hillary stored 'top secret' documents on her unsecured personal server.
If this woman is not indicted for her crimes, then the only explanation will be that Barack Obama and his administration are thoroughly corrupt.
From the article you linked:

Quote:
No emails released so far were stamped "CLASSIFIED" or "TOP SECRET," but reviewers previously had designated more than 1,000 messages at lower classification levels for public release. Friday's will be the first at the top secret level.

Even if Clinton only read, and didn't write or forward the secret messages, she still would have been required to report classification slippages that she recognized. But without classification markings, that may have been difficult, especially if the information was in the public domain.
While I still wont vote for her, it still looks that none of the emails mentioned were classified at the time they were sent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,222,159 times
Reputation: 7373
Big difference between not being classified at the time they were sent versus not having the classification on the messages, even though they were classified.

Tough to believe that something would be determined to be top secret after the fact.

Frankly, I doubt it.

I think the classification was somehow removed when transferred to her private account.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Alaska
7,506 posts, read 5,753,469 times
Reputation: 4889
Default '

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Well it appears the Obama admin did released this. Also Obama had a chat with Sanders yesterday I believe. I wonder if there's a connection.
You betcha! Bernice's a socialist just like obummer at heart!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:15 PM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,369,433 times
Reputation: 3059
But NOBODY pays attention to the Friday night dump.

Nuttin' to be excited about.

So, how does ol' Josh get privileged info from the FBI?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:17 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 29 days ago)
 
27,651 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
The only question remaining is whether she knew it would be hacked and got a nice overseas dontation for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:27 PM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,369,433 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
The only question remaining is whether she knew it would be hacked and got a nice overseas dontation for it.
More likely the emails she claimed are personal are the ones dealing with the donation issues. And that is a whole nuther can of worms. Big rich STINKY ones to boot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:33 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 29 days ago)
 
27,651 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrench409 View Post
More likely the emails she claimed are personal are the ones dealing with the donation issues. And that is a whole nuther can of worms. Big rich STINKY ones to boot.
Johnny Chung comes to mind
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top