Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2008, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,460,378 times
Reputation: 1052

Advertisements

The rich will pay for them. The tax rate on the top 10% of households has been going down since 1980.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2008, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Louisville KY Metro area
4,826 posts, read 14,310,863 times
Reputation: 2159
Quote:
Originally Posted by roseba View Post
How do you pay for our current expenditures in Iraq?
Just for the record.... Almost all the expenditures "in" Iraq are not "in" Iraq, but rather for tools, weapons, and wages right here in the good Ol' USA. I am absolutely certain that 1000's of the anti-war crowd would be agast with the fact that their personal occupation is on 2 or 3 degrees removed from the "war". For those who don't get it, that means while a protestor may be screaming about the cost of the war, their own personal income is based on people working at a defense plant next door, or just down the road.

Funny thing... liberals want to put tax dollars back into the economy by government choice, not by investor decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 07:44 PM
 
Location: DFW, TX
2,935 posts, read 6,715,569 times
Reputation: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomocox View Post
Just for the record.... Almost all the expenditures "in" Iraq are not "in" Iraq, but rather for tools, weapons, and wages right here in the good Ol' USA. I am absolutely certain that 1000's of the anti-war crowd would be agast with the fact that their personal occupation is on 2 or 3 degrees removed from the "war". For those who don't get it, that means while a protestor may be screaming about the cost of the war, their own personal income is based on people working at a defense plant next door, or just down the road.

Funny thing... liberals want to put tax dollars back into the economy by government choice, not by investor decision.
This argument is laughable... really. Imagine the number of jobs we could create if the government chose to ban the use of oil and the government funded the innovation of nuclear, solar, wind, and wave power. Or imagine the boon to the accounting industry if the government required every family to hire an auditor to assess the family budget and force them to comply with draconian regulations. I could come up with a hundred more ways that the government could do to spend our money that someone could twist into the form of creating economic growth, but it's a perverse idea.

Don't assume liberals are opposed to the war and feel spending is out of control... it's people who have a grasp on the state of our economy and how our foreign policy can bring this country to ruins. I love how in one argument I'm painted as an ultra-rightwing conservative because I don't believe in wealth redistribution, yet in the other I am a communist liberal because I think the wars we have created are milking us dry. The partisan politics would be hilarious if they weren't so damaging to this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 08:09 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,444,022 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessica1000 View Post
I am independent-leaning democrat, who loves CATO and hates Heritage foundations. The goverment has increased in last 50 years under bush faster than anyone(he even beats LBJ in most of the areas). Only the social conservative and foreign policy crazy-intervention-all-the-time crowd like him.

I don't want any democrat spending increase but I also don't want more tax cuts and defense spending increase at the same time, which only increases the debt!(supply side doesn't work). We need to cut spending(defense and non-defense) and maybe increase income tax to cut this debt.
So let me ask you this what do you think about all of Hillary Clintons earmarks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Louisville KY Metro area
4,826 posts, read 14,310,863 times
Reputation: 2159
Quote:
Originally Posted by twojciac View Post
This argument is laughable... really. Imagine the number of jobs we could create if the government chose to ban the use of oil and the government funded the innovation of nuclear, solar, wind, and wave power. Or imagine the boon to the accounting industry if the government required every family to hire an auditor to assess the family budget and force them to comply with draconian regulations. I could come up with a hundred more ways that the government could do to spend our money that someone could twist into the form of creating economic growth, but it's a perverse idea.

Don't assume liberals are opposed to the war and feel spending is out of control... it's people who have a grasp on the state of our economy and how our foreign policy can bring this country to ruins. I love how in one argument I'm painted as an ultra-rightwing conservative because I don't believe in wealth redistribution, yet in the other I am a communist liberal because I think the wars we have created are milking us dry. The partisan politics would be hilarious if they weren't so damaging to this country.
HA HA! I am laughing. You couldn't even respond with a point-counter point approach. Since FDR's new deal, the entire US economy has been formulated around some form of socialism. We can go extreme and include the military industrial complex. This means that real war can often be disguised by phoney war. You may call Iraq either real or phoney... my point was only to point that very little of the cost of the Iraqi war leaves the US coast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 10:16 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by crittersitter View Post
I noticed that no one has answered the original question. Perhaps that's because the Democrats can't pay for all their little presents without raising the middle class taxpayers taxes. That's not the answer liberals are looking for but it is realistic.
Long as I'm not the only one who realised this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 10:19 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by buildings_and_bridges View Post
Yeah, I'm all for putting all my social worker friends out of work.
The amount of tax money saved by not paying these "federal" wages, would be such a fiancial boost to the economy, that it'll make the current $150B welfare handout (i.e. Current economy check rebate bill) seem like Ron Paul actually has a chance at winning the presidency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 10:23 PM
 
Location: DFW, TX
2,935 posts, read 6,715,569 times
Reputation: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomocox View Post
HA HA! I am laughing. You couldn't even respond with a point-counter point approach. Since FDR's new deal, the entire US economy has been formulated around some form of socialism. We can go extreme and include the military industrial complex. This means that real war can often be disguised by phoney war. You may call Iraq either real or phoney... my point was only to point that very little of the cost of the Iraqi war leaves the US coast.
We're rebuilding infrastructure in Iraq that we destroyed. Sure we're using our contractors and our equipment, but that's hardly a justification for the spending. It's wealth redistribution and I don't care if it's from me to a welfare queen or me to the military industrial complex, either way I don't like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,510 posts, read 33,305,373 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessica1000 View Post
Just like Bush has passed 1.4 trillions of tax cuts over 10 years, almost 2 trillion defense increase over 15 years and almost 1 /1.5 trillion other non-defense spending increase over 10 to 15 years.

And increase of debt by almost 4 trillion under President Bush 8 years.......... Don't impeach, hang him.
Tax cuts don't cause a deficit; overspending does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 10:35 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Tax cuts don't cause a deficit; overspending does.
Correct. The fact is the federal government is bringing in more money now then ever in history. Its the spending thats killing the budget. Ironically, the medicare/medicade changes, the perscription costs as just an example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top