Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it to protect and defend the Constitution or to protect and defend us?
I forcefully believe it's the former. I'm a Democrat, a liberal, and I love America. I'm sick and tired of people and politicians, usually (but not always) Republicans, justifying blatantly unconstitutional, unethical, an immoral behavior in the name of my safety and security. Just this morning I read a CNN opinion piece by Republican senator Sam Brownback arguing against closing Guantanamo. In the first sentence he says "The most important responsibility for any president is the safety and security of the American people." He uses this flawed premise thorough and is seemingly willing to justify any act as long as it keeps Americans safe. Why is this man allowed through the doors of Congress?
I, like many Americans, am willing to give up my life in defense of American ideals and freedoms. I would rather die in a terrorist attack than see the Constitution and the American ideals embodied within it weakened or destroyed in the name of protecting me. Is that insane, or patriotic?
Last edited by ramanboy33; 01-24-2009 at 11:19 AM..
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
It's to preserve, protect and defend the constitution.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
It's to preserve, protect and defend the constitution.
If that's the job description, most of them failed miserably.
The defense department is supposed to protect us but they've been too busy protecting the government. We are expendable.
Interesting how the government wants to keep us safe but tries so hard to keep us from protecting ourselves. They are interested in control, not safety. Americans need to distinguish between the two.
If that's the job description, most of them failed miserably.
The defense department is supposed to protect us but they've been too busy protecting the government. We are expendable.
Interesting how the government wants to keep us safe but tries so hard to keep us from protecting ourselves. They are interested in control, not safety. Americans need to distinguish between the two.
The federal government has not actually represented and served the people in a very long time.
What is the Primary Responsibility of the President?
Reader's Digest version: to act in the nation's best interests.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.