Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One of the things you learn at college is how to conduct proper research.
Exactly. I'll believe the American Chemical Society and their certified Bachelor of SCIENCE degree program before I'll believe an online poster, any day.
Exactly. I'll believe the American Chemical Society and their certified Bachelor of SCIENCE degree program before I'll believe an online poster, any day.
Except that you failed to read the empirical research I provided and your own link doesn't support your statements.
Sure, you have a bachelor of science in chemistry. You have bachelors of science in many liberal arts programs. Chemistry is one of many. You can get a bachelors of science in math and physics as well. That doesn't change the fact that they are all liberal arts. Your mistake (among disagreeing with academia as a whole) is equating BA/BS to something that defines whether a discipline is a liberal art or not.
If you don't want to believe thousands of years of academia and college education, that's up to you. But that doesn't change the facts.
Exactly. I'll believe the American Chemical Society and their certified Bachelor of SCIENCE degree program before I'll believe an online poster, any day.
What's interesting is your source disagrees with you. Further demonstrating your lack of proper research. Take a look at their liberal arts at work page.... their first example has a degree in Physics. In fact, a masters of SCIENCE in physics. There you go, you've proven it with your own source. Science is a liberal art.
Except that you failed to read the empirical research I provided and your own link doesn't support your statements.
Hmmm... The American Chemical Society disregards that supposed "empirical research," as well. I'll take their word over that of posturing pondering pundits.
Hmmm... The American Chemical Society disregards that supposed "empirical research," as well. I'll take their word over that of posturing pondering pundits.
Alliteration.
Where do they disregard it? Seems like you're making stuff up.
"Coupled with the liberal arts curriculum central to the William and Mary program, the degree supplies you with a good understanding of the many principles and techniques associated with chemistry."
"Coupled with the liberal arts curriculum central to the William and Mary program, the degree supplies you with a good understanding of the many principles and techniques associated with chemistry."
To put it in terms you can understand: Eggs coupled with bacon does NOT mean eggs are bacon.
Fair enough. However, that's not a good analogy since Academia has defined natural sciences as liberal arts for centuries. Academia doesn't change simply because you say so. Your opinions don't change Aristotle's work.
Fair enough. However, that's not a good analogy since Academia has defined natural sciences as liberal arts for centuries.
I've posted several links that indicate exactly the opposite.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
