Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Will Trump supporters be aghast? Will they support his position? Or will those Trump supporters inhabiting this thread change their previously held opinions?
We shall see.
Scalia's death told me Trump was not in my vision anymore.
We need someone constitutional to appoint a constitutionalist, in it's original intent.
kidnappers, rapists, drug traffickers, terror cells, (foreign and American), sex-trafficking organziations, Sony studios hackers all rose up to clap. Are they innocent in our utopian land?
The innocent are the 14 dead in SB. The 100+ in Paris but you don't count them since they don't fall under the U.S. constitution but they are a western country ALLY and number one tourist spot for Americans.
The innocent citizens are trying to fight Cyber-crimes and yet they should leave this phone as a safe haven for them? c'mon.
I don't agree with tapping/collecting data 100% either, but there are cases where it's warranted.
Is Apple saying no to letting a Fed sit there while an Apple engineer retrieves the data? They should at least get the data from a dead terrorist. Murderers should not be allowed privacy rights for communication.
Well, it is 50/50 in this debate per the media.
Disclosure: Owner of Samsung Galaxy
Their are 14 dead, because our government has mentally disarmed people just like you!
If government allowed us our 2nd amendment rights, to self protection, and quit brain washing people like you, that the idea is bad. there may have been 2 dead, instead of 14...... Evil, is still evil.
this leaves a lot of opportunity for hackers/software developers out there to do it. Obviously there's demand for it.
There is a huge demand for heroin too, doesn't make it legal. Same applies here....unless of course the government wants to force you to do it under the guise of keeping us safe from terrorists.
Plus this underscores how tight the security is on an iPhone. It hasn't been done yet because its not exactly easy, and requires proprietary information....so forcing Apple to do it opens a huge can of worms and makes it easier for others to figure it out.
There is a huge demand for heroin too, doesn't make it legal. Same applies here....unless of course the government wants to force you to do it under the guise of keeping us safe from terrorists.
Plus this underscores how tight the security is on an iPhone. It hasn't been done yet because its not exactly easy, and requires proprietary information....so forcing Apple to do it opens a huge can of worms and makes it easier for others to figure it out.
It does no such thing, if you can't figure it out with the OS now a new decrypted one won't do anything for you either, because just like you said, it's proprietary.. The iOS ALREADY decrypts the device or you wouldn't be able to access it. Apple is full of **** when they say they can't. It's already a part of their damn OS. Do you think the government is going to confiscate billions of iPhones and install this decrypted OS on them just for the hell of it or do you think that they will be able to install the OS remotely on anyone's iPhone at will? Both scenarios are complete BS.
For crying out loud, this is for the children. How many people need to die? Why is Apple being so difficult? What do they have to hide? Why doesn't anybody need encryption?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.