Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2016, 10:07 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeastah View Post
if they're gone in next election, couldn't that mean they're replaced with a Dem?

it's a 2-way street you know.

Ridiculous how linear some of you people think.

Try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2016, 10:08 AM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,554,033 times
Reputation: 4471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Ridiculous how linear some of you people think.

Try again.
isn't it, though? as if GOP were the only option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Here in Illinois it will be Tammy Duckworth running ads against Mark Kirk if he publicly states he refuses to fulfill his Constitutional duties as a senator. And with the GOP having to defend 24 seats, many in swing states, there is as much if not more peril for Republican senators if they choose to obstruct the process rather than fulfill their obligations. Here in blue Illinois, with a very popular opponent in Duckworth, it's a big risk for Kirk.
I wish I could rep you because you hit it on the head.

The majority of voters aren't the entrenched Obamahaters as the OP is. They don't see following the process that has been followed for 200 years in a calm and non-controversial manner, as cause to vote against a Senator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 10:22 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
The seat wouldn't be safe from another Republican or maybe even a proven conservative independent.
I think it would be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 10:28 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,116,249 times
Reputation: 8011
Doesn't matter perhaps. You've seen this before, maybe.

Step 1: On November 8, 2016, elect a Democratic majority in the Senate (not crazy since there's a 24-10 differential in seats up for election)
Step 2: On January 3, 2017, the new Senate members get sworn in.
Step 3: On January 4, 2017, the Senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer, deploys the nuclear option for SCOTUS nominations, Ted Cruz has to put away his copy of Green Eggs and Ham and cry in the corner in a fetal position.
Step 4: On January 4, 2017, President Obama nominates a Eric Holder (haha) to the vacancy left by Scalia. Senate holds hearings.
Step 5: On January 19, 2017, the Senate confirms Eric Holder and he is appointed as a SCOTUS Justice.
Step 6: On January 20, 2017, President Obama leaves office.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,448,256 times
Reputation: 5047
What happens to republican senators that vote for an Obama supreme nomination?

Perhaps what has happened in the past will help in guessing what will happen in the future? When Supreme Court Justice Kagan was confirmed, five Republican U.S. Senators voted for her. They were: Richard Lugar, Judd Gregg, Lindsey Graham, Susan Collins, and Olympia Snowe.

When Supreme Court Justice Kagan was confirmed, nine Republican U.S. Senators voted for her. They were: George Voinovich, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Judd Gregg, Richard Lugar, Kit Bond, Mel Martinez, Lindsey Graham, and Lamar Alexander.

I know that three of these Senators continue to serve in the Senate today; not sure about the rest (still there, or moved on to something else, or defeated in primary/general election, or whatever), and not sufficiently interested in doing the research to find out.

President Obama will nominate a qualified individual. And then, let the (Republican) games begin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 11:00 AM
 
59,040 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14281
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Here in Illinois it will be Tammy Duckworth running ads against Mark Kirk if he publicly states he refuses to fulfill his Constitutional duties as a senator. And with the GOP having to defend 24 seats, many in swing states, there is as much if not more peril for Republican senators if they choose to obstruct the process rather than fulfill their obligations. Here in blue Illinois, with a very popular opponent in Duckworth, it's a big risk for Kirk.
"it will be Tammy Duckworth running ads against Mark Kirk if he publicly states he refuses to fulfill his Constitutional duties as a senator."

He obviously does NOT know what THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES encompass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,366,055 times
Reputation: 2922
Mitch already stated his intentions before Scalia's body made it too the morgue. The {R} Senate Campaign Committee will solicit donors to defeat that evil Obama and deny him the appointment to save America. Partisan {R}s will eat it up like a Philly steak sandwich and big money is raised. Mitch in secret makes threats to Senate members he will take away their share if they dare vote for Obama"s appointment. Obama sends up two for consideration the lock step {R}s deny both.
The elections take place, {R}s had their palms greased, they hold onto to the Senate barely. You heard it here first.

Last edited by Swingblade; 02-17-2016 at 12:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,366,055 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"it will be Tammy Duckworth running ads against Mark Kirk if he publicly states he refuses to fulfill his Constitutional duties as a senator."

He obviously does NOT know what THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES encompass.
Kirk will fulfill his constitutional duties and there will be votes on Obama's appointment. Nothing in the constitution that says he has to vote yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 11:41 AM
 
Location: USA
31,041 posts, read 22,070,533 times
Reputation: 19081
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
We will elect Senator Sanders as president and back him up with a Democratic majority in the Senate. In the meantime the Senate will find enough Republicans to support President Obama's nominee to SCOTUS that an moderate Judge will be approved. After Sanders is elected and the Senate has a Democratic majority several of the elderly Judges will retire and a truly Liberal court of younger judges will result. That will protect the country from the pernicious attempts by the Republicans to try to return this country to a time that never was and never should have been.
Put down the pipe. If what your proposing came to fruition, the middle class would shrivel up even smaller than it is now and we would all be employed at Walmart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top