Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Assuming Hillary gets a free pass on the email scandal and wins the presidency....
Sterling should be Angry and Hillary should Pardon him 8 66.67%
Sterling should be Angry, but Hillary should NOT Pardon him 1 8.33%
Sterling should NOT be Angry, but Hillary should Pardon him 1 8.33%
Sterling should NOT be Angry and Hillary should NOT Pardon him 2 16.67%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2016, 01:56 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,673,547 times
Reputation: 4254

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Hillary didn't leak classified material to the NYT. End of story.
Oh, who knew that the law on disclosing classified material to an unauthorized entity, only applied if you were disclosing it to the press.

Sorry, but the law does not specify who classified material must be improperly disclosed to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2016, 01:59 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,673,547 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
right she leeked it to the Russians and the chineese
Even if all she did was allow her aides and staff to view and handle classified material, which they were not authorized to see, she will have violated the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2016, 03:19 PM
 
2,727 posts, read 2,832,514 times
Reputation: 4113
I'd love to see Libs head explode with circular references when asked if this double standard was due to White privilege
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2016, 03:33 PM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20861
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Hillary didn't leak classified material to the NYT. End of story.
You are right- She leaked it to the Russians, Iranians, and the Chinese, not the NYT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 07:49 AM
 
20,454 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Even if all she did was allow her aides and staff to view and handle classified material, which they were not authorized to see, she will have violated the law.
agree


but she did more than that.


she ordered those staff to send her emails that ended up on per private server that was sitting in some schleps bathroom closet... those emails included Special Access Program materials....




that's really really really against the law
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 11:27 AM
 
26,463 posts, read 15,053,236 times
Reputation: 14615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
agree


but she did more than that.


she ordered those staff to send her emails that ended up on per private server that was sitting in some schleps bathroom closet... those emails included Special Access Program materials....




that's really really really against the law
Hillary also sent classified information with her cell phone via foreign telecoms. Foreign telecoms that often are manned and help foreign intelligence communities. Any classified private email Hillary sent in such conditions should be considered compromised. She did this in a long list of countries, including China.

It is a legitimate question to ask if Hillary is too senile to remember government rules and protocol of sending classified info, because the only other alternative is that she is a traitor.

We do know that China hacked some email accounts as is.


FBN Exclusive: DOJ Officials Fear Foreign Telecoms Hacked Clinton Emails, Server | Fox Business
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 11:31 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
It doesn't matter where it ends up.
Wow. Just wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 09:16 PM
 
22,653 posts, read 24,575,170 times
Reputation: 20319
Come on, HilHil and Bill know GOBS of very, VERY important people......you can't touch them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 09:41 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,363,905 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
And used an unsecured line to send classified info while in China.

She was either that reckless with sensitive data or too senile to remember simple rules.








I say she did it knowing foreign governments would hack into her private server and she left all that information there deliberately and specifically for that purpose.


She knows the people who would learn our nation`s secrets know how to return a favor.


Can I prove it?


No.


Does someone have a better explanation?


I still haven`t heard one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2016, 06:40 AM
 
26,463 posts, read 15,053,236 times
Reputation: 14615
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
I say she did it knowing foreign governments would hack into her private server and she left all that information there deliberately and specifically for that purpose.


She knows the people who would learn our nation`s secrets know how to return a favor.


Can I prove it?


No.


Does someone have a better explanation?


I still haven`t heard one.
Who knows.

Yet it is a fact that Hillary sent classified emails while in foreign countries via unsecured foreign telecom companies. This is a huge no-no that she would have been trained not to do.

What are the realistic options for why Hillary would do such a thing?

A) She is senile and can't remember simple rules.

B) She is a traitor and wanted the classified information to be compromised.

C) She is so reckless with classified info that she literally just doesn't give a crap about our national security.


What other options are there? Can any liberal planning to vote for Hillary answer this question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top