Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, it's not. A Republican majority Senate can decide what they will or will not consider, just as the Dem majority Senate did under Harry Reid's leadership.
Another deflection. Some articles from last year about Obamacare, which have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Nothing to do with it? The Obamacare pain will be felt much more intensely this year than last by tens of millions of Americans. And the later in the year, the more they've had to pay those premiums and high deductibles out of pocket. November elections. Just when people will be cursing Obamacare almost the most.
No, it's not. A Republican majority Senate can decide what they will or will not consider, just as the Dem majority Senate did under Harry Reid's leadership.
When did the Democrats under Harry Reid ever decide to not even hold a hearing on a Supreme Court candidate? You're trying to really muddy the waters with an abstract comparison, and it isn't working for your cause.
Nothing to do with it? The Obamacare pain will be felt much more intensely this year than last by tens of millions of Americans. And the later in the year, the more they've had to pay those premiums and high deductibles out of pocket. November elections. Just when people will be cursing Obamacare almost the most.
We had an election in 2012 and it seems most Americans decided that they prefer Obamacare to the previously profits-over-people "Let them die" system advocated by the Republicans.
We had an election in 2012 and it seems most Americans decided that they prefer Obamacare to the previously profits-over-people "Let them die" system advocated by the Republicans.
Apparently not. They gave first the House (in 2010) and then the Senate (in 2014) to the Republicans to rein in Obama. Checks and Balances, and all that.
Apparently not. They gave first the House (in 2010) and then the Senate (in 2014) to the Republicans to rein in Obama. Checks and Balances, and all that.
Harry Reid failed to submit over 300 House bills to the Senate for a vote during the Obama Admin. Same reason. He didn't have to.
You didn't answer my question, yet again. I'm sure you'll keep pulling on the same talking point, but the fact remains that the GOP stance on not even holding a hearing before a nominee is even announced is completely without precedent.
Yes, I did. The Senate is under no obligation to actually call anything for a vote, bills or nominations. Harry Reid didn't submit over 300 House bills for a vote during the Obama Admin. The current Senate won't submit an Obama nomination for a vote. Same thing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
