Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Most liberals (not all) are extreme hypocrites and are jealous of happy successful people and their strongest motivation is for power over those happy successful people so they can be the buzz kill. A significant minority of Liberals are just an extension of the Nationalist Socialists of Germany and Communists of Russia & China and they are blood thirsty for power to kill millions....it's their ultimate buzz.
Trump might represent a lot of what America is not, but Chicago, to what ought to be its embarrassment, represents a lot of what Obama and his minions have in mind.
And I will repeat myself because it is clear you are not listening. The ONLY people that can shut down an event are the ones that put on the event. People can't protest in hopes of shutting down an event all they want, but it is up to the ones that actually put on the event to make that decision, not the protesters.
I don't know how I can make it anymore simple for you to understand.....if you don't get this post, then I don't know what to say....
Also, I am not Marxist, that has to be the silliest thing I have heard today.
LOL! Did you just say that with a straight face? Really?
Given the current dreadful condition of not only Chicago but the entire state of Illinois it's very obvious that unchecked liberalism and myopic civil service unions can turn any city or state into an economic basket case.
If you need the best example as to what happens when liberals take over a formerly thriving city and turn it into a disaster in too many ways to count, look no farther than the Pelosi clan and their 'contributions' to the city of Baltimore.
Obama and his fellow liberals simply don't believe in the First Amendment.
Likely because a large portion of them are so overly confident in their own beliefs that they view any disagreement with them as prima facie evidence of some great moral or intellectual failing. Everyone who disagrees with them is racist, sexist, greedy, selfish, stupid, ignorant, privileged, bought off by the Koch brothers or Wall Street, or hates the poor. There can be no other reason. Every policy discussion is an epic, Manichean battle between good and evil.
I do not use the term "liberal" to refer such people, however. Liberalism has traditionally referred to support for individual liberties and laissez-faire capitalism. They are not liberals in the traditional sense, and I have no desire to participate in the sullying of liberalism's good name. John Locke, Frederic Bastiat, Milton Friedman, Thomas Paine, Adam Smith and Thomas Jefferson were liberals. There is nothing liberal about progressives and social justice warriors.
The funny thing about politics is that both sides think the other is equally mistaken and incorrect.
And the confounding aspect I find, is that depending on where and how you were raised, the likelihood of your political alignment becomes predictable. Does that predictability take away any of the value in your belief? If you believe if, just because it was what was taught to you?
I've talked to liberals and conservatives who are absolutely convinced the other side is wrong and brain damaged. How is someone supposed to make up their minds, when if you listen to either side long enough, you begin to agree with them? Is true independent thought possible? All the diehard liberals or conservatives who read this, did you reach your beliefs on your own, or were you raised to believe the things you do, whether through a parent, teacher, or peers?
Liberals have gained ultimate power of nations through intimidation and violence leading to Communism and Naziism (which both caused the deaths of millions of innocent lives) by supposedly advocating for the common man when their true purpose is power and control...most of today's liberals in the USA fit in the same category....they hate freedom of the individual and seek to destroy it.
Likely because a large portion of them are so overly confident in their own beliefs that they view any disagreement with them as prima facie evidence of some great moral or intellectual failing. Everyone who disagrees with them is racist, sexist, greedy, selfish, stupid, ignorant, privileged, bought off by the Koch brothers or Wall Street, or hates the poor. There can be no other reason. Every policy discussion is an epic, Manichean battle between good and evil.
I do not use the term "liberal" to refer such people, however. Liberalism has traditionally referred to support for individual liberties and laissez-faire capitalism. They are not liberals in the traditional sense, and I have no desire to participate in the sullying of liberalism's good name. John Locke, Frederic Bastiat, Milton Friedman, Thomas Paine, Adam Smith and Thomas Jefferson were liberals. There is nothing liberal about progressives and social justice warriors.
That is correct.
Liberals are not "liberal"; liberals are fascists.
Please stop pretending you have a monopoly on patriotism.
There's nothing patriotic about constantly trying to deny people's rights. There's nothing patriotic about getting thousands of young Americans killed and wasting trillions of dollars invading countries for the enrichment of cronies.
Non Americans do not have a "right" to immigrate here.
Becoming an American citizen is not supposed to be easy.
Funny how the Left wails about how we shouldn't be the world's police force but it's just fine with us being the world's biggest orphanage.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.