Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2008, 08:24 AM
 
Location: South Central PA
1,565 posts, read 4,310,854 times
Reputation: 378

Advertisements

As long as pilot door is locked ant the pilot's carry guns, there wont be any hijackings.

Bush is by far the biggest loser we've ever elected as president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2008, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Albemarle, NC
7,730 posts, read 14,158,279 times
Reputation: 1520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marodi View Post
As long as pilot door is locked ant the pilot's carry guns, there wont be any hijackings.

Bush is by far the biggest loser we've ever elected as president.
We could all fly naked. That would help. Europeans shouldn't have an issue with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by paperhouse View Post
I understand wanting to protect the country from terrorists, but the regulations are going to decrease travel to the US. Right now, we're getting a lot of Europeans coming over to take advantage of the weak dollar. This is a terrible idea to tick off Europe.
As one who flies internationally a lot, I must say that "Air Marshals" are quite common on foreign carriers. If you want to see security in action, fly El Al.

I have no problem with increased use of Air Marshal on American flaged carriers.

I also do not have any problem with the flight deck crew being armed

Last edited by Greatday; 02-11-2008 at 08:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 03:59 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,636,388 times
Reputation: 3870
International tourism into the US brings in somewhere between $50 and $75 billion into the US economy each year in direct spending, depending on how you classify tourist arrivals vs. part-time residents and that sort of thing.

After taking a sharp hit from 2001 to 2003, those numbers rebounded and have increased modestly.

However, they have not kept pace with the growth of worldwide tourism, which has taken off explosively. Many people in countries WITH the visa waiver program are afriad that hostile US border agents will arbitrarily "throw them in jail" or otherwise hassle them. As a result, the US misses out on quite a large revenue stream from tourism that is going to other countries ranging from Canada and Mexico to Thailand and Australia.

These measures would make things quite a lot worse for the US tourist industry. The European press has been rather scathing about them. They haven't been implemented yet, but if they were implemented in full, Americans working in the international tourist industry may want to start looking for other lines of work.

The problem is, measures like these are not merely limited to tourism. There are already reports about the number of highly-skilled professionals and foreign students leaving the US due to what they feel are onerous or hostile border and residency requirements. There are now more Chinese foreign students studying in European universities than American ones, which is quite a reversal from only a few years ago, when American universities were seen as the pinnacle of world education in China, and India as well.

This is unfortunate when you think about the massive boost the US economy has gotten from foreign nationals choosing to start companies in the US rather than their home countries.

It really doesn't matter if we think these measures are isolationist. What matters economically is whether or not the rest of the world thinks so. And increasingly, it does.

Especially in a time like this when our economic performance is slackening, this isn't a very smart measure. You have to think about what is deterred when measures like this come into effect. You don't just deter tourism; you deter present and future investment in the country that would otherwise be brought by foreigners who find America a friendly place to settle and start a business.

The other problem is that these measures don't actually increase our safety, for a lot of different reasons. Think of it this way - had these measures been in place in 2000, would any of the Sept. 11 hijackers have been prevented from coming to the US? These were mostly Saudi students on student visas. They didn't arrive through visa waiver; they did it the old-fashioned way with visas and from a country whose nationals were scrutinized even back then. But since they had no record of militant group involvement, and kept things quiet, it didn't matter.

Also - and I'm going to put this bluntly - at some point, even if you could eliminate all threat of terrorism through draconian isolationist measures, it wouldn't be worth the economic cost. If we have to take a few hits to maintain the strength and appeal of our economy to folks around the world, perhaps that's more than worth it.

Think of it this way - we could probably reduce auto fatalities from 44,000 per year to only a few hundred per year by putting the speed limit at 25mph and grinding up all the roads so that this limit was self-enforcing. But the economic costs would be outrageous, and so we accept that innocent blood will be lost for the sake of expediency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 09:34 PM
 
4,135 posts, read 10,815,877 times
Reputation: 2698
Perhaps El Al should come and train our pilots & air marshals for plane protection.

One thing you really need to think about: you have to have very stable people in those jobs and they have to be able to use the weapon. Otherwise, they could endanger people by freezing when the need came. I am sure there are more than enough people for the jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 09:42 PM
 
Location: South Central PA
1,565 posts, read 4,310,854 times
Reputation: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
However, they have not kept pace with the growth of worldwide tourism, which has taken off explosively. Many people in countries WITH the visa waiver program are afriad that hostile US border agents will arbitrarily "throw them in jail" or otherwise hassle them.
Have you gone through british customs? GOOD GOD. I've been through misc customs before in other countries, but the british just pound you. I was there for 5-10 minutes getting virtually interrogated by the guy before I was allowed in. Back in the US waiting in the customs line there, the one young lady was saying how she actually broke down crying because of how ruthless they are. Crazy. The american image is significantly diffrent than the fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
I see nothing wrong with keeping foreigners out of the U.S.

Now if our military could just be brought home to defend the borders of the U.S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 11:36 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
Every time I'm on a plane I always picture some guy running toward the cockpit. Then I see the guy getting stomped to death by several passengers.

I'm not saying these lunatics will never incorporate planes into there plans again, I'm just saying I don't think passengers are gonna sit back and let someone take over a plane like they did on 9/11.
Agreed.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2008, 01:16 AM
 
Location: Denver
9,963 posts, read 18,499,454 times
Reputation: 6181
Yeah when an country is in a recession, throw out the tourists, great plan...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2008, 06:41 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
I see nothing wrong with keeping foreigners out of the U.S.
Including Tourists?

What about Americans going to visit other countries? Would you prohibit that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top