Migrants Attack 60 Minutes Crew In Sweden (supporter, laws, status, murder)

[mountainrose]

Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310

I'll do you one better. I'm personally friends with quite a few Muslims. :

why does that not surprise me.......

[bentlebee]

We have told the same over and over since we came here and back in the days it was already going on but not on a big scale as right now.

Close to 20 years ago I couldn't wear any Jewish symbols as it was cause of being spit on and I'm not very religious.

It is just that many people believe it is the far from my bed show so it is exaggerated and therefore not true.

Amsterdam used to be a great city, like Rotterdam and Den Haag (Le Hague) but don't go after 6 pm and stay away from many areas as it they already call it Morocco on the water and the cops don't even want to go in these neighborhoods.

[MPowering1]

Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310

I'll do you one better. I'm personally friends with quite a few Muslims. I would be willing to receive 10 Muslims in return for giving up 1 Southern conservative... Muslims have their issues just like everyone else. But I don't see Muslims like Keith Ellison legislating away the rights of women and enacting voter suppression...

So am I. Aren't we special?

What does that have to do with the topic at hand, though? Not much.

I'm wondering if you're Muslim and taking offense to what's being posted here.

[dude1984]

It's sad when European Mayberry becomes a Muslim hood...bound to happen when you let 1.88% of your population from a completely different culture with little to no skills in. It would be like America letting over 6.3 million of these people in.

Swedish men need to stop being effeminate cowards and the women need to stop being such mindless bundles of "love".

Originally Posted by bobisinthehouse

some Countries are not happy about the stuff happening.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqKNmoOj4Lk

What the hell was going on at the very end of the that video? It was really weird.

[bobisinthehouse]

Yes it was weird and I am sure it might happen the same way in other countries, during political meetings.

Meanwhile, here is a friendly match between Sweden and Bangladesh.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcDCMuT6kRc

[Teckeeee]

Originally Posted by Retroit

Hopefully they will start attacking the traitorous politicians that let these thugs into the country.

I used to like and respect Merkel, but now after the carnage, seeing the Sharia police drag her off

[Tyster]

Originally Posted by michiganmoon

Bernie Sanders is the most honest candidate left of the big 4.

But he seems so naive. On CNN he just said that people returning home from ISIS are arrested in 5 minutes. This is not true.

40 jihadis who joined ISIS return to U.S.

Obama administration confirms American ISIS fighters have returned and 'the FBI is looking at them' after terror army calls for attacks on the US | Daily Mail Online

I wouldn't trust Bernie Sanders with a water pistol, let alone national security. He's a dim bulb.

[Teckeeee]

Originally Posted by Tyster

I wouldn't trust Bernie Sanders with a water pistol, let alone national security. He's a dim bulb.

When Bernie let the BLM rush the stage = I am weak on national security and will let any angry drama queen rush the stage for free ice cream

He communicated clearly to me his message that day

[dechatelet]

Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310

Students of history don't have to imagine "southern conservatives" committing violence. All you need to do is pick up a book..

The things you read on the internet...

Yep, lynchings in the south take place all the time.

There were ten of them last weekend.

Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310

I condemn violence in most cases. I just don't stereotype entire religions and ethnic groups into being fundamentally violent. This is where my opinion and yours parts ways...

Islam is a fundamentally violent religion, just as Mohammed was a fundamentally violent man.

Islam demands the subjugation, conversion or murder of all non-Muslims.

It completely rejects democracy, individual rights, individual freedom, religious pluralism, and human rights.

Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310

So what should we do? Don't let anyone in the country?

Don't let more Muslims into this country.

Originally Posted by oldtoiletsmkgdflrpots

solution: set up a site in Saudi Arabia. Everyone can "help" them where they are there. Why ship people across the world when they need to go back to Mecca? For that matter why not settle them in Mecca itself?

Muslims don't want other Muslims.

If they did, the Palestinian refugee problem would have been solved 67 years ago.

Originally Posted by juneaubound

There is a legal immigration process already in place. A million people a year already use that option. I would say that we let PLENTY of people into this country each year already. At least legal immigrants ARE fully vetted.

Most are, but there are exceptions.

Tashfeen Malik -- given a K-1 visa -- wasn't properly vetted, and she and her husband murdered fourteen people in San Bernardino in an act of terrorism.

The refugee Tsarnaev brothers and their mother -- admitted to this country legally -- were not properly vetted.

The mother was clearly an Islamist, and the sons -- following in her footsteps -- committed the Boston bombing.

Originally Posted by oldtoiletsmkgdflrpots

Whose bright idea was it to relocate the recent refugees anyway?

Obama, Hillary, John Kerry, and the other Democrats.

Originally Posted by Costaexpress

one question is, are you so sure that the western world will "wake up" after a catastrophic incident?

what does that "wake up" look like? what does the west do?

I'm not sure that the west is capable of doing anything.

We would have to outlaw Islam and its practitioners and deport all Muslims.

I can hear the shrieking now: "That's unconstitutional and un-American!"

It turns out the Founders were naive about Islam when they tagged it as a legitimate religion that was appropriate for the west.

At the very least, we would have to stop more Muslims from coming here, and the liberals aren't about to accept that.

Originally Posted by oldtoiletsmkgdflrpots

What organizations are making the decisions to relocate? Or who is making the decision?

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees "vets" the refugees and then forwards the names of those it approves to the U.S. State Department.

The U.S. State Department then uses Catholic Charities and other Christian and Jewish groups to take small groups of refugees under their wing and sprinkle them in communities throughout the U.S.

It's all very "hush-hush" and "under the radar" so that local residents don't know what's going on and don't have a chance to object.

This is the way our wonderful government -- under both Democrats and Republicans -- has insulted the American people.

And it is the way our Christian and Jewish church leaders have disregarded both common sense and the legitimate concerns of the American people.

Why aren't all the "...stans" taking them in? Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

There is no reason why poor countries such as the above would be willing to have poor refugees added to their populations.

[oldtoiletsmkgdflrpots]

Thank you for taking the time to answer some of the questions dechatelet. And, for doing so without insulting the person asking the question.