Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She sent an email to her daughter if you want to call that an official response. However the investigation did not conclude until weeks later so I would call that opinion.
Why didn't the committee ask the question in the last 12 hour interrogation.
And now they've stated that they won't be releasing anything additional until after the election (who is it that's politicizing this?). That's not surprising since it's clear that Obama's DOS has been slow-walking this investigation, and that what they did release proves that Hillary lied and the DOS complied.
It's all about preserving--and continuing--Obama's "legacy."
The information that is the subject of this thread has been out in the public since at least Oct 2015 when it displayed during the questioning of Clinton during her appearance before the Gowdy committee. If you watch the video I linked in this thread you can see it for yourself.
Judicial Watch may have just obtained it, but its not like it was secret.
They had to sue to get it all released. And we are finding out, like many federal judges, that not all have been released. They are still holding on to 100's. They suspect, the most incriminating. Or why have they held them tight to their chest.
They had to sue to get it all released. And we are finding out, like many federal judges, that not all have been released. They are still holding on to 100's. They suspect, the most incriminating. Or why have they held them tight to their chest.
In this video from Oct 2015 you can see the document that Judicial Watch obtained in March 2016.
The State Department released a phone transcipt this week that proves Hillary Clinton knew the Benghazi massacre was a planned attack and not a protest.
She lied, she lied, she lied.
You know it, I know it, and most smart people on this forum know it, yet her supporters won't give in.
This administration is covering up for their own screw up of the situation. They are all one in the same Liars!
They ought to watch out, just who they put down, and point fingers at! There no better.
You know it, I know it, and most smart people on this forum know it, yet her supporters won't give in.
This administration is covering up for their own screw up of the situation. They are all one in the same Liars!
They ought to watch out, just who they put down, and point fingers at! There no better.
You don't know it. You believe it. There is a difference. Clinton changed what she was saying about the attack after the intelligence services disseminated their analysis. If you want to call that a lie, so be it.
BTW: I'm not a Clinton supporter. I would love it if there was a different choice.
You don't know it. You believe it. There is a difference. Clinton changed what she was saying about the attack after the intelligence services disseminated their analysis. If you want to call that a lie, so be it.
Yes, and just recently we've seen the clips where in a speech she told the audience that "we" are going to get rid of all the coal mines and those jobs will go away...
Then, when coal mining families asked her a direct question around the table (in her recent visit to WVA) about it, she changed what she was saying about the coal industry. After she was confronted with it she denied it and said it was taken out of context.
Seeing both those clips together, one after the other, shows how glibly she tries to get out of a tight spot.
Yes, and just recently we've seen the clips where in a speech she told the audience that "we" are going to get rid of all the coal mines and those jobs will go away...
Then, when coal mining families asked her a direct question around the table (in her recent visit to WVA) about it, she changed what she was saying about the coal industry. After she was confronted with it she denied it and said it was taken out of context.
Seeing both those clips together, one after the other, shows how glibly she tries to get out of a tight spot.
What does that have to do with Benghazi?
As I've written in this thread previously I think there are plenty of issues were Clinton can and should be politically attacked. Her comments after the Benghazi attack however are totally understandable, based on what the intelligence community was claiming.
As I've written in this thread previously I think there are plenty of issues were Clinton can and should be politically attacked. Her comments after the Benghazi attack however are totally understandable, based on what the intelligence community was claiming.
Even giving Clinton the benefit of every doubt, her statements were a deceptive attempt to maximize the video and minimize terrorists, extremists as the cause of what happened in both Libya and Egypt.
No fair person would consider FactCheck an anti-Clinton source, yet even they wrote:
"But, at this point [10/23/2015], we do know that Obama and others in the administration were quick to cite the anti-Muslim video as the underlying cause for the attack in Benghazi that killed four U.S. diplomats, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens. And they were slow to acknowledge it was a premeditated terrorist attack, and they downplayed reports that it might have been.
There was no 'intelligence community' rationale to do what she did from night one: place the video front and center as The Sole cause or Benghazi.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
). That's not surprising since it's clear that Obama's DOS has been slow-walking this investigation, and that what they did release proves that Hillary lied and the DOS complied.
