Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is a foreign policy.com article from Malcolm Nance and Nada Bakos about how US intelligence agencies believed the attack to be linked to the video.
Malcolm Nance is a former Naval Intelligence officer with 34 years of experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He speaks five dialects of Arabic. In 2011, he was a strategy advisor to the Libyan Transitional National Council in Benghazi and at the Ajdabiyah battle front.
Nada Bakos is a former CIA analyst and targeting officer who served on the team charged with analyzing the relationship between Iraq, al Qaeda, and the 9/11 attacks. During the Iraq War, she was the chief targeting officer following Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
----
Just a reminder: the Obama administration has spent hundreds of billions of dollars training, arming and equipping US soldiers since 2008. They've ordered the deaths of tens of thousands of ISIS and Al Qaeda fighters, and they've done this alongside US allies in the Iraqi Security Forces and Kurdistan Peshmerga. And they've been unable to prevent ISIS/Al Qaeda from killing thousands of Iraqi and Syrian civilians and soldiers.
The Obama administration is not Superman. They cannot be everywhere at once, they cannot save every good person, and they cannot kill every bad person in the world before they hurt people.
Did Clinton mess up in Benghazi and try to save face? Probably.
But the conspiracy theories floating around the Benghazi issue seem to accuse Clinton of willfully allowing the embassy staff to be killed. If this is true, why did she help spend hundreds of billions of dollars training and equipping hundreds of thousands of US military staff? If this is true, why did she help Obama kill tens of thousands of terrorists? And if this is true, why did she and Obama try to save thousands of Afghan and Iraqi civilian lives?
If this is true, why would the Obama administration specifically want the embassy staff to die in Benghazi, when they continually try to save the lives of US military personnel and US allies in literally hundreds of other engagements with the ISIS enemy?
Is the theory that the Benghazi staff had some kind of secret dirt on Clinton's dealings with the lizard people from Xandor who are the true rulers of America or something? Because while that may be crazy to suggest, it's the only plausible theory I can come up with as to why Clinton would specifically set out to allow the Benghazi ambassador to die.
This is election season. Americans will elect their next president. It is serious business.
If Hillary lied, if she broke the law, if a Romanian hacker broke into her email server, etc. etc. why isn't she indicted?
Every day, I read new revelations regarding Hillary. If things are so terrible, why isn't she put on trial?
When will they charge her? After been elected?
This is election season. Americans will elect their next president. It is serious business.
If Hillary lied, if she broke the law, if a Romanian hacker broke into her email server, etc. etc. why isn't she indicted?
Every day, I read new revelations regarding Hillary. If things are so terrible, why isn't she put on trial?
When will they charge her? After been elected?
This incident dates back to the first Obama administration. Nothing recent. Don't you think that if they had a solid case against her they would press charges already?
It's not the attack it self, it's all the lies afterwards....
You have to wonder why? Why a video? What was the reason to even try to pin it on a video.
I tell you why. There were youtube videos after video, of Obama lying over and over. There were videos exposing the corruption in the Obama administration, and the elections were coming up. The videos were making Obama uneasy as it was exposing him for what he really is.
They were going to use the crisis in Benghazi, to go after the first amendment and on-line videos not being censored by the government. (so they didn't offend)
NO. It was planned to be used to control the internet political messaging in the upcoming elections. They were going to hit the 1st amendment hard.
They used the IRS, to control the political messaging at the grassroots level. They needed control of the internet.
This incident dates back to the first Obama administration. Nothing recent. Don't you think that if they had a solid case against her they would press charges already?
No, not really....possibly if she would have given everything up when asked for it, did she?
^^^Rhetorical BTW...
Have you ever been involved in a FBI case as large as this?
I am currently involved and it's taken almost 2 years and we are not half way close to being ready for charges...
No, not really....possibly if she would have given everything up when asked for it, did she?
^^^Rhetorical BTW...
Have you ever been involved in a FBI case as large as this?
I am currently involved and it's taken almost 2 years and we are not half way close to being ready for charges...
How is it "large"?
Hillary gave them the server. She admitted using it instead the official state department email. She deleted mail she considered "personal". If she broke the law, there was enough time and opportunity to accuse her. Otherwise, let it go.
They can't wait until the elections are over to make a decision. Electing the right president is more important for America than this procedural BS. If she is elected and later charged, the damage to US will be worse than the email incident.
How is it "large"?
Hillary gave them the server. She admitted using it instead the official state department email. She deleted mail she considered "personal". If she broke the law, there was enough time and opportunity to accuse her. Otherwise, let it go.
They can't wait until the elections are over to make a decision. Electing the right president is more important for America than this procedural BS. If she is elected and later charged, the damage to US will be worse than the email incident.
People died, that's how large it is......
Not really, there is just more than "here is what we charge you with" sorry, I'm no hillary supporter by no means, but the FBI needs to get this correct the first time
Sure after she "wiped it with a cloth."
No she did not give up all her emails, all at once, have you been paying attention?
Listen, if anyone in my level would have done anything like this, we would be in jail or at least our SC revoked for the time being......
Now, the State Dept is saying all the e-mails the guy who set up her server, are missing and they cannot find them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
