Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
“It’s hard to believe that an IT staffer who set up Hillary Clinton’s reckless email server never sent or received a single work-related email in the four years he worked at the State Department,"
Nah, emails conveniently just get "lost" over a 4 year time frame all the time. And it's all ok!
But I'll play. Let's say the state department lost them. This is the woman you want running the country who's people she oversaw can't manage emails/back them up? A woman who doesn't know what's classified/not on her server? Can't follow the clearly worded word of law?
"“Whoever… knowingly removes (classified) documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” (18 U.S.C., section 1924)"
So can anyone explain to me what in the world people see in this woman and want to vote for her? No, being a woman isn't an answer.
Blame the liberal universities for this allowance of poor behaviour...and the turning a blind eye to reality....blame "Woman's Studies".....I know this young female professional writer who when she heard Hilary was running for the highest office commented..."what a rocking great time to be alive"....mean while she knew nothing of Hilary. Look at this candidates opening statements at the beginning of her campaign. She pandered immediately to the feminist eccentric voter....she started off with that stale rhetorical about the infamous imaginary "glass ceiling?
Right away she was insinuating that if woman voted her in she would make sure they got more money...kind of a promissory bribe of sorts....Kind of the duping Obama did for black Americans...that he would make their lives better...he did nothing. Hilary will do nothing also.
Why didn't anyone care when the Bush White House lost millions of emails? This is partisan BS, which is why I could care less about Clinton's emails and why it will not matter. All of a sudden the GOP cares? Good luck with that.
Why didn't anyone care when the Bush White House lost millions of emails? This is partisan BS, which is why I could care less about Clinton's emails and why it will not matter. All of a sudden the GOP cares? Good luck with that.
There's enough sleaze on both sides for sure. Some people(me!) don't defend one lying/sleazy side more than the other.
btw, the time of bush is long gone. Let it go. If you want more recent history, the team obama has enough url's of sleazy behavior and emails "disappearing"(remember the irs fun?) that could fill pages upon pages here. Besides, hillary is running now and that should be the concern of voters as she wants to be the leader of this country. Talk about sending a chill up my spine!
I like how a person who is completely computer illiterate like Criminal Clinton can say in a TV interview that she has full confidence that no one hacked her server. Anyone who knows anything about computers knows that as soon as your network is no longer part of a classified network and exposed to the public, you have no way of knowing that. It's amazing that there are emails missing and that it doesn't seem to matter to the FBI.
It's amazing that there are emails missing and that it doesn't seem to matter to the FBI.
I'm sure it matters very much to them, this is the guy they granted immunity to. If he has copies which I would assume is likely they would already be in the hands of the FBI.
There's enough sleaze on both sides for sure. Some people(me!) don't defend one lying/sleazy side more than the other.
btw, the time of bush is long gone. Let it go. If you want more recent history, the team obama has enough url's of sleazy behavior and emails "disappearing"(remember the irs fun?) that could fill pages upon pages here. Besides, hillary is running now and that should be the concern of voters as she wants to be the leader of this country. Talk about sending a chill up my spine!
I'm not sure if you realize that you did the exact opposite of what you "say" you do in your first line? You said you don't defend one side more than the other, but you clearly dismissed the Bush email scandals, stating "let it go", but slammed both Obama and Clinton. You have a right to your opinion, but don't pretend to be non-partisan if you don't call ALL of them out on their BS.
I'm not sure if you realize that you did the exact opposite of what you "say" you do in your first line? You said you don't defend one side more than the other, but you clearly dismissed the Bush email scandals, stating "let it go", but slammed both Obama and Clinton. You have a right to your opinion, but don't pretend to be non-partisan if you don't call ALL of them out on their BS.
But he framed his comment with "the time of Bush is long gone" - Obama is now and Hillary is 6 months from now. Perhaps what happened nearly a decade ago isn't as important as what's happening now and tomorrow?
Why didn't anyone care when the Bush White House lost millions of emails? This is partisan BS, which is why I could care less about Clinton's emails and why it will not matter. All of a sudden the GOP cares? Good luck with that.
Maybe its because the FBI was too busy looking for those darn Rose law firm billing records, or the documents that were taken from Vince Fosters desk after his apparent suicide, or perhaps the Feds were trying to discover what documents were stolen out of the national archives by Clinton operative Sandy Burgler..er Berger.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.