Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:47 AM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,814,566 times
Reputation: 8442

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan85 View Post
Says a lot about our young men. They may be jobless or in jail- but they have their cell phones, beer, pot, and other electronic gadgets to play with! This can't be their fault- let's make sure they do not take any personal responsibility for their situations!
This is what I thought as well.

As a woman, I'll state that IMO men are sliding down the totem poll in the younger generations. Many men will try to blame women or feminism for their decline, but feminism doesn't stop a young man from getting a job.

I know MANY young men who spend a large amount of their time (even men in their 30s) playing video games and being unproductive. Too many males today are too fixated on gaming and porn and not enough on education and employment in the younger generation.

Hopefully they'll mature and get themselves together.

However, I will note that my family is predominantly males and we have quite a few young men in that age group and all of them are employed and none of them are in jail/prison.

I will also point out that I felt it played on people's emotions to say that the young men were "jobless" or "incarcerated." People will and did focus on the incarceration point (hence all the "drug offenses" talk) when the article in its first paragraph stated that of the 16% of this male population, that 13% are unemployed and only 3% incarcerated. The unemployed/jobless factor is MUCH greater than the incarcerated one and is much more indicative of a trend of shiftlessness amongst the men in our younger generation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2016, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
The unemployed/jobless factor is MUCH greater than the incarcerated one and is much more indicative of a trend of shiftlessness amongst the men in our younger generation.
Good point.

The Earnings Curve for the 18-34 crowd is heavily skewed. They won't earn as much in real terms as their parents did, and that has ramifications on public polices later on down the road, especially Social Security and Welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 01:25 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,155,879 times
Reputation: 54995
Quote:
Originally Posted by yueng-ling View Post
It somehow proves the education system failed.
Don't blame it on education, blame it on the family breakdown. Especially Black families.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 02:54 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,814,566 times
Reputation: 8442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Don't blame it on education, blame it on the family breakdown. Especially Black families.
LOL, they did not mention black males specifically. Black males are a VERY low percentage of the 16-34 male age group in this country. The vast majority of those shiftless males are white.

ETA: Also, I am black as are my 3 brothers and 8 nephews. All of them are employed and not in jail and all of them (save one) is between 16 and 34 years of age. We also were born to a single mother!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,851,639 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
Congress needs to end the drug war, all Obama can do is pass an executive order that would hinder the police more than it would decriminalize drugs. Maybe it is time for Congress to do their job.
The president can do more than that. The President appoints the Head of the DEA. At least the Feds wouldn't be wasting their time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:09 PM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,285,564 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
The president can do more than that. The President appoints the Head of the DEA. At least the Feds wouldn't be wasting their time.
That is true, though even that still wouldn't be very much. We need Congress to pass a bill that at least decriminalize drugs in general, and even better would be making marijuana legal and treated like alcohol and cigarettes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top