Fight Inside Kremlin To Release 20,000 of Hillary Clinton's Email

[ProudVietnamVeteran]

Originally Posted by thecoalman

There is no way to make any determination of how secure that server was unless you have access to it. Were they keeping up with updates? Were they locking down services they don't need? Were they whitelisting IP's for logging in? Were they using brute force detection?

Running a server is not that difficult, running it well and securely is. I run my own server and I'm 99.9% confident that if someone with knowledge and skill wanted to break in they are going to get in.

You are so right!!!

[Mircea]

Originally Posted by ProudVietnamVeteran

Largely known debate in the Kremlin between the Russian Foreign Ministry and the Russian Intelligence Services. They are trying to come to a meeting of the minds to determine whether the Russian government should release some 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that it obtained either by hacking her directly or by hacking into the email of her confidante, Sid Blumenthal.

They only need to release one as proof.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by lvmensch

Check the red. It is easy if you can read. And where are your sources that her office was not a SCIF?

I will not hold my breath...

One of the hallmarks of an RWN is there inability to understand when they have lost an argument.

The daily caller? I thought you could provide some actual references to something that actually had some backing, but as we can see there is nothing in the links or link you provided that says her office is a scif.

LOL, I'm not making the claim that her office IS a SCIF....you are, it's not up to me to prove your point.

I thought you 50+ years of having a SC would have some sort of backing, but I guess not if you use the "daily caller" as your source of an absolute....

[lvmensch]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

The daily caller? I thought you could provide some actual references to something that actually had some backing, but as we can see there is nothing in the links or link you provided that says her office is a scif.

LOL, I'm not making the claim that her office IS a SCIF....you are, it's not up to me to prove your point.

I thought you 50+ years of having a SC would have some sort of backing, but I guess not if you use the "daily caller" as your source of an absolute....

The Observer, ArsTechnica, Fox News and the Daily Caller all point out Clinton worked in A SCIF.

Threw in the Daily Caller so you would feel at home.

But chucksnee say no. And everyone knows chucknees knows it all.

Enough - Clinton worked in a SCIF Fact.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by lvmensch

The Observer, ArsTechnica, Fox News and the Daily Caller all point out Clinton worked in A SCIF.

Threw in the Daily Caller so you would feel at home.

But chucksnee say no. And everyone knows chucknees knows it all.

Enough - Clinton worked in a SCIF Fact.

Where are those links in this thread, give me post numbers.

No, it is obvious that you know everything, the science is settled, right, because fox, the daily caller, and whoever you say, says it's a SCIF...so therefore, it's a SCIF, not only because those places say it is , but because ole lvmensch says so, and his 50+ years of having a SC....

Listen, it's O.K. if you get your "official" news from the MSM, I don't......never have, maybe you should have thrown in MSNBC, then it would have been gold, right....


Her office is not a SCIF because fox says so, it's not a SCIF because you provide links to fox...

BTW, why are you not defending that PDF file...you said that was your proof....right?

JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 - Judicial Watch

JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 pg 10-11 - Judicial Watch

JW v State Hillary BB NSA-IAD 00646 pg 10-11 - Judicial Watch

“Shut Up and Color” - Judicial Watch



I guess if you say it enough, it has to be true....

And you used ArsTechnica as a source...HHHAHahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa