Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That is impossible to answer because not all states did a primary, and even then primaries varied between open and closed primaries.
As on the Republican side, how either party structures their nominating process is their right. And the rules are pretty obvious right up front. If Bernie -- who I luke-warmly supported until just the last week or so, didn't want to run under Democratic Party rules, he should have stayed out of it.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 22 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6039
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharinganAi
Sore loser should apply to one who loses fair and square. There have been a lot of instances where things have been very shady.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumf
^THIS!
Like the 'Heads I win, Tails you lose' coin flip...
The HiLIARy is crapping her shorts over concerns that she's not already wrapped up the nod...
Oh, and I just hate that for her.... NOT!
The rules havent hanged, and there was no coin flip like that LOL.
Bernie has a large core of supporters and some of them just happen to be Independents and some are even current republicans. In some states, you have to be registered as a Democrat to vote in the Democratic primary.
NO one cheated you or other Bernie supporters because you failed to register or change your registration before the deadline, and to be a delegate you have to actually be called a faithful party member in some states, and voting for Jill Stein or Mitt Romney 4 years ago does indeed disqualify those people as well.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 22 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx
That is impossible to answer because not all states did a primary, and even then primaries varied between open and closed primaries.
No it is not.
What you mean to say is that the results do not reflect what you believe to be the real support levels of the candidate. but who has more votes is a fact recorded by the secretary of state of each that has held a primary.
What you mean to say is that the results do not reflect what you believe to be the real support levels of the candidate. but who has more votes is a fact recorded by the secretary of state of each that has held a primary.
Not at all, I think Hillary has won more states than Sanders and is ahead on the delegate count. I do however understand that the number of votes don't matter when trying to compare who is ahead because Hillary beat Obama in total of votes, but didn't win the nomination. That is why the total number of votes doesn't matter.
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is VERY angry Bernie isn't bowing down to corrupt Hillary. It's no secret Debbie has favored Hillary from the start, maybe because she is a feminist herself. Now she is angry voters and Bernie aren't falling into line, what a corrupt awful person this woman is... I hope every Bernie supporter stands up the the corrupt system!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
