Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
13 is young.
Can you imagine if a man did this..
what's almost as sad is all the grown "men" commenting
they wish their teacher was like this.. at 13 ?
That's too young to even know what the heck is going on.
It is not about when is the proper age to pop your cherry or lose your virginity. lol It is about child and an adult. This is the WHOLE argument here. Pretty black and white.
Last edited by lilyflower3191981; 06-02-2016 at 05:11 PM..
It is not about when is the proper age to pop your cherry or lose your virginity. lol It is about child and an adult. This is the WHOLE argument here. Pretty black and white.
Age of consent laws in most of USA allow sex between an adult and a minor.
Age of consent laws in most of USA allow sex between an adult and a minor.
Actually,
Federal law makes it criminal to engage in a sexual act with another person who is between the age of 12 and 16 if they are at least four years younger than you. Each state takes a different approach as the age of consent has ranged from 10 to 18.
Age of consent laws in most of USA allow sex between an adult and a minor.
Any of those laws allow sex between a 24 year-old and 13 year-old.
I'd guess that a vast majority of normal people understand that parents who promote and facilitate a sexual relationship between their 13 year-old son and his 24 year-old public school teacher are unfit.
If that makes me a judgmental bigot, to judgmental bigots.
The main reason for statutory rape laws is to avoid teen pregnancy. In this case teen pregnancy cannot occur.
The only reason for a law that covers both genders is to avoid gender inequality. There is no victim in this crime.
And a really good reason to enforce the law for both genders is that regardless of age, males who father children are liable to pay child support. If the father is below the legal age of emancipation then the grandparents are liable for that child support, until the father is emancipated (either legally or by age).
Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123
If you ask 100 guys if there is a victim in this case, 99 will lough in your face.
Ask the same 100 guys if they'd be happy with being liable for child support on their 18th birthday and see how many laugh in your face now.
That is not my job to decide. Like I said, I would call the parents unfit parents. (because they are HAPPY with this type of relationship) No more no less.
There are more female pedos than male pedos, it seems.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pretty black and white.
to judgmental bigots.
