Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If the expected changes from the CO2 theory had happened, there would be no debate, and no denial that the AGW theory was correct, and we are screwed. The record loss of crops from cold this year is another reason why we know the theory was wrong.
Despite the deception by some, there is more snow when it's colder, and the data clearly shows the NH is cooling in winter, not warming. Examples are so numerous is ludicrous to argue this.
If the expected changes from the CO2 theory had happened, there would be no debate, and no denial that the AGW theory was correct, and we are screwed. The record loss of crops from cold this year is another reason why we know the theory was wrong.
Thanks for the link. This, however, will be dismissed as a one-off, anomaly, random event.
If the expected changes from the CO2 theory had happened, there would be no debate, and no denial that the AGW theory was correct, and we are screwed. The record loss of crops from cold this year is another reason why we know the theory was wrong.
Why exactly do you think that this is somehow proof that there is no global warming?
There are dozens and dozens of widely available articles that explain how warmer summers lead to colder winters... and on top of that, you're only looking at the Northern Hemisphere, and only during the winter.
The yearly average global temperatures continue to increase.
Thanks for the link. This, however, will be dismissed as a one-off, anomaly, random event.
The article is fine, the weather is not an 'anomaly'... but it doesn't prove what you think it proves.
So I'm accepting this as proof that you don't know how climate change works.
Read carefully. You are trying to say something that was not claimed.
All I see is you posting about crop losses from cold as if it contradicts the theory.
It doesn't.
And even if someone did predict something different, how do 'failed' predictions about the effects of global warming somehow mean that CO2 emissions aren't warming the planet? Do you not see that they aren't the same thing?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
