Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
On the other hand I've heard that Climate Change deniers are stooges for huge multi-national corporations to reverse any can safeguards or environmental regulations that could impact their profits.
And I've heard that Santa Claus lives at the North Pole and flies around the world in a Reindeer powered sled giving away toys every year near the end of December.
There is a valid point there. Is the current climate change inside of the background noise of the planet.
Of course Earths natural mechanisms are at play. But we are exacerbating our planet's ability to cycle through greenhouse gases through their various cycles (carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, etc).
On the other hand I've heard that Climate Change deniers are stooges for huge multi-national corporations to reverse any can safeguards or environmental regulations that could impact their profits.
We'll certainly. How many trillions of dollars are behind polluters? Manufacturing, utilities, and energy production are multi trillion dollar industries.
We'll certainly. How many trillions of dollars are behind polluters? Manufacturing, utilities, and energy production are multi trillion dollar industries.
And how many trillions are loaned against assets that will shortly be under sea water?
There is a valid point there. Is the current climate change inside of the background noise of the planet?
It gets argued with religious fervor.
My take is soot started it and feed back loops keep it going, CO2 is an also ran.
And my take is climate is alwAys in flux, our data gathering is still in its infancy, our analysis of that data (ex: accurately measuring temps in the 1700, 1800, most of the 1900's to a precise, not approximate degree) to draw a good baseline, much less to precisely state with true statistical confidence prior years, our understanding of global atmosphere/ocean relationships, measurement of solar radiation for hundreds of thousands of years, etc... That man's impact is the sole cause and the cockamamie solutions so far offered are just that. That does not preclude in any way looking to lessen our global impact, including what we are putting into the atmosphere.
As stated elsewhere, I have more concern about potable water.
And how many trillions are loaned against assets that will shortly be under sea water?
Too little to late.
The government funded coastal flood insurance program for homeowners? That is the leftists who are primarily championing that sort of foolishness.
However, the flooding comes from periodic storms, and has yet to pay out even a single dollar related to flooding associated with any permanent rise in sea levels, as far as I can tell.
Last edited by Spartacus713; 06-02-2016 at 02:21 PM..
If companies were selling poison baby food, would the answer be raising taxes on poison baby food to reduce demand?
If the UN and the political leaders really believed the AGW prophecy that would lead to millions of deaths, wouldn't they call for hard caps instead of " sure you can go over if you'll pay a tax"?
Of course, we know it's just a scam to skim money from the producers.
We are a world powered mainly by the use of fossil fuels, it's the life blood that drives the world's economy.
So all these corrupt liars are doing, is pretending the are just trying to save the planet, when all they are doing is leeching off the the life blood of the world's producers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.