Poll: Colorado's Amendment 69, which establishes universal health care, shows wide support for it's passing (how much, military)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That cannot happen when government takes over. Doctors will Default to government employees, as their income will be paid exclusively in US Treasury funds, with no other private sector income.
We use to shop and choose for a doctor. Now government mandates we shop for insurance they have chosen to choose from. Next there would be no choice at all.
Liberty. Know what it is, before we lose it all
Medicare works mostly with private sector facilities and providers, and is essentially senior/disabled single payer.
I personally and professionally still prefer a public option, and let the privates do as they may. Single payer as you demonstrate can be too brutal on the HC providers.
That cannot happen when government takes over. Doctors will Default to government employees, as their income will be paid exclusively in US Treasury funds, with no other private sector income.
We use to shop and choose for a doctor. Now government mandates we shop for insurance they have chosen to choose from. Next there would be no choice at all.
If Obama was a better unifier of his own party, he could have passed universal health care instead of Obama care garbage.
First of all.... You can make the same unifier case for the entire Republican Party. You realize their current nominee has divided conservatives even further. So spare me, but I guess if you simply need to feel better sure.
Lastly, republicans didn't expand Medicaid like Aca wanted to. Here in Texas, they refused Medicaid expansion and couldn't figure out anything to get Texas from being the most uninsured state in the nation. It's amusing how something doesn't work well when the other side refuses to implement anything. Don't you find it amusing?
Can't be. The poor, our seniors and those with pre-existing disease require central controls and supports. This ain't Zimbabwe!
Uh, No, they don't. The MOST the federal gov't should do is provide a modicum of financial assistance for those truly in need. And that's IT. Apart from that it should have ZERO involvement.
Uh, No, they don't. The MOST the federal gov't should do is provide a modicum of financial assistance for those truly in need. And that's IT. Apart from that it should have ZERO involvement.
In a capitalist free market system, the best manner in which to do most business IMO, they will need assistance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
