Google: We're Not Rigging 'Crooked Hillary' Searches
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
(I have a blue light filter on my phone at nights, which is why it looks orangey...it's not because it's a Donald Trump-themed search engine. )
Sorry, I am a bit tired. Let me try to clarify. It appears that the defaults being provided for you on your phone are being provided from the phones own internal dictionary -not google.
OK quick analytics search engine information for you and others. Google has a policy that filters out the word "criminal as a autocomplete". And has since BEFORE the primaries!
In the past they had a policy of filtering out the words "Pat Buchanan".
On my computer too when I search "crooked Hilla.." the auto complete is "crooked Hillary Bernie".
There is no auto-complete even when I search "crooked Hillary Clinto..."
I was using google yesterday to search for this video and could not find it anywhere-even though I remembered most of the words in the title. On Bing/Yahoo I found it instantly as one of the top search results. I need to stop using google as my default search engine....ahh so hard though.
Sorry, I am a bit tired. Let me try to clarify. It appears that the defaults being provided for you on your phone are being provided from the phones own internal dictionary -not google.
a search for a popular tv show that doesn't have a name in it? Thats your response? A search for tv shows? I wonder why you didn't try the Manson one. The one being discussed.....ohhh because it demonstrates my point?
This kind of deceptive arguing on your side is not particularly persuasive you know?
a search for a popular tv show that doesn't have a name in it? Thats your response? A search for tv shows? I wonder why you didn't try the Manson one. The one being discussed.....ohhh because it demonstrates my point?
This kind of deceptive arguing on your side is not particularly persuasive you know?
Quite a stretch there sparky. I didn't search for a popular tv show, are you incapable of seeing the entire image? I put in "crim" which was as far as I got. I was going to type in "criminal" since you claimed that Google had some filter on allowing the word "criminal" to autocomplete.
I don't need your insipid Manson example, I went straight to "criminal" the word that you stated Google would not allow to be autocompleted and proved you wrong.
Quite a stretch there sparky. I didn't search for a popular tv show, are you incapable of seeing the entire image? I put in "crim" which was as far as I got. I was going to type in "criminal" since you claimed that Google had some filter on allowing the word "criminal" to autocomplete.
I don't need your insipid Manson example, I went straight to "criminal" the word that you stated Google would not allow to be autocompleted and proved you wrong.
No, you purposely avoided a example involving a person. The example discussed, and not because its "insipid", but because you were looking for a way to avoid the actual facts. Googles algorithm is designed to work this way, and it has nothing to do with politics. This is the right wing yelling the sky is falling-when as usual IT ISN'T. And this is bad, its bad for everyone. Because it gets people used to all of this nonsense being lies. It means that it will be easier for REAL activity like this to occur in the future.
a search for a popular tv show that doesn't have a name in it? Thats your response? A search for tv shows? I wonder why you didn't try the Manson one. The one being discussed.....ohhh because it demonstrates my point?
This kind of deceptive arguing on your side is not particularly persuasive you know?
I doubt anyone is searching for Charles Manson criminal. I even doubt that Charles Manson murderer is high on the search list.
Try something a bit more current.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)
