Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's a natural fact that every people and culture has a right to their own space. It's recognized in international law. And has been true until about 40 to 50 years ago. It's not an opinion. It's nature. How societies and civilizations developed over 10's of thousands of years. There's no "opinion" to it.
It changed 40 to 50 years ago because technology has allowed people to travel all over the world easily. Take away all the airplanes and see how quick things will revert. Take away the Internet and see what changes.
It changed 40 to 50 years ago because technology has allowed people to travel all over the world easily. Take away all the airplanes and see how quick things will revert. Take away the Internet and see what changes.
No it changed because Ted Kennedy introduced the Bill his handlers and all the rest of Congress's handlers wanted him to pass.
It's what "They" wanted.
It had nothing to do with airplanes and everything to do with treason, aggression, the next phase of the hostile take over and nothing but bad intentions as we can see today.
"They" are out for destruction and "they" are winning and succeeding because not one person in a hundred has the time, critical thinking skills, theological background or compunction to figure out what's really happening.
You cannot possibly do this, when these people don't value Human Life. You cannot, at anytime any one of these refugee's for any reason, can do even worse then what has happened.
The only thing to do, is to stop the flow of these people who are coming in, hey they are not being vetted properly, we have no idea who in the hell these people are, or what they have in mind.
The only way at this point, is to stop the flow from coming in, hurt some feelings tough, life is tough, about damn sweet time we think about our own first, before any other.
And fudg anyone who preaches political correctness, because that sentiment is chit. And we are where we are today because of it, thanks a hell of a lot. Our future is looking dim, I feel sorry for children and babies growing up into this Country, with what they have to face, because people protected political correctness, over the safety of our people!
Obama said he had an agenda, and he has not let us down, thanks a lot for such horrendous change look what we have become, a society who now has to look over our shoulder no matter where we go. Because to a certain party refugee's are more important then the safety of Americans.
The government needs to invest in a small hog farm. Every time one of these Islamic butchers pulls a terrorist act, if they are alive, strip them, bind their hands and feet and throw them in with the hogs. Hogs will eat a human being in a short time, only thing you'll later find is teeth. Alive or dead, same solution. Make sure it's televised live on Al Jazeera.
I think in a world where being PC is encouraged to the point that "if you're not PC, you're a racist" needs to end immediately.
if you see something, say something.
The entire point to PC - you can look it up - is that it started as an ironic disagreement (in the 1920s?) with long, bombastic harangues freighted with lots of technical party language - typically @ party meetings/ideological orientation or training. It was a kind of in-joke, @ the expense of whoever was delivering the harangue, typically some party flunky, toeing the party line. PC has nothing to do directly with racism.
The US Rightest bloviators-for-hire got hold of the term in the 1980s or so, & ate it up as the hottest thing going since bashing Jane Fonda for Vietnam.
So, as an ironic term, PC is never going to catch on in the US. The US in general doesn't do subtlety, & so PC is right out. & certainly the various pachyderms who wallow on the Right-wing of the media spectrum aren't into anything that isn't full-throated red meat. Which means that there's no call for the term @ all in US discourse. Except among the people who know what it used to mean, perhaps.
How do you punish or discourage people who don't fear death?
The same way you punish & discourage people who don't follow any tenets of the non-aggression principle (those who iniatiate violence by theft, assault, rape, murder):
You shun them from society. Unfortunately this requires humans owning themselves (their labor and fruits of) which can only be achieved via elimination of the state which is something people aren't ready to accept.
Had this loon or the Stanford rapist lived in a free society we could have denied them goods & services thus either stopping them/severely hampering their will/ability to do bad things.
The state protects bad people and in many ways promotes their nefarious agendas. Until people understand this the good people will continue to be victimized.
I think in a world where being PC is encouraged to the point that "if you're not PC, you're a racist" needs to end immediately.
if you see something, say something.
This
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Clash of Kulturs
