Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please point it out it me as I really don't see a difference - yes these men had already perpetrated a crime - but the way we've been vetting people ( or not correctly vetting ) allows for the same thing to occur with these immigrants from the Middle East we're allowing in now.
No, you are on the trail. You have pointed out one difference. There are a few others. Again, we are focusing, in this mind-exercise, on the differences between Obama's (or, State Department) action in 2011, and what Mr. Trump is proposing.
Here is the real math. The majority knows Hilary and Democrats are corrupt. But they don't care. She promises them welfare. As far as they are concerned, utopia is Venezula.
Here is the real math. The majority knows Hilary and Democrats are corrupt. But they don't care. She promises them welfare. As far as they are concerned, utopia is Venezula.
Wow, when you put it like who can argue with such sound, relevant logic, especially backed by "real math".
No wonder this election/country is a dumpster fire. The thread is about Trump and the Muslim Ban, and a poster gets so defensive, he has to bring up Hillary, Democrats and welfare. By the way, it's Venezuela.
Ugh, I have a bad taste in my mouth "defending" Hillary.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere
Here is the real math. The majority knows Hilary and Democrats are corrupt. But they don't care. She promises them welfare. As far as they are concerned, utopia is Venezula.
Sounds more like Trump University math. The real math is that anyone with open eyes knows that both major parties are equally corrupt and two sides of the same corrupt coin.
If Donny really wanted to make a difference he would've run as an (I) and possibly had a chance to smack down the system, as it is he chose to dive into the cesspool and has no business complaining when he comes up reeking.
The majority of people know that the vetting system is messed up and too many people have been let in that have no interest in integrating. But I think many people would prefer changes to the system but not a total shutdown.
What has been totally lacking in Trumps response is what happens after he shuts down immigration, he keeps saying "until we figure it out". Well he has had several months now what will he do differently, there will still be refugees without passports and lacking in other areas so what I she proposing?
What changes to the system.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The real math is that anyone with open eyes knows that both major parties are equally corrupt and two sides of the same corrupt coin.