Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:17 PM
 
6,304 posts, read 9,014,186 times
Reputation: 8149

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoloforLife View Post
Fisher is a whiny individual who was a mediocre student. Even her law firm said she was not the best case to challenge AA.
Well, isn't that an interesting, albeit entirely unsurprising, piece of news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,847 posts, read 6,186,733 times
Reputation: 12327
Here's a link to UT- Austin's Freshman class profile from last year that provides some good numbers relevant to the discussion at hand. Only 5% of the incoming class was African American and 22% Hispanic, with the large majority still White and Asian. And, the Freshman retention rate is 95%, so is UT really letting in a large number of unqualified minority applicants? It doesn't seem so.

https://admissions.utexas.edu/explore/freshman-profile

Last edited by Texas Ag 93; 06-23-2016 at 02:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:03 PM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,900,561 times
Reputation: 17353
And totally contradicts their prior ruling about TX being required a higher burden of proof to continue that practice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:42 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,248,351 times
Reputation: 8231
Quote:
Originally Posted by mishigas73 View Post
How should a college or university determine who is admitted? What criteria are acceptable to you?

Frst initial, and First 3 letters of last name along with academic accomplishments. Best students get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:56 PM
 
6,304 posts, read 9,014,186 times
Reputation: 8149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me007gold View Post
Frst initial, and First 3 letters of last name along with academic accomplishments. Best students get it.
In your opinion, it should be all about academic achievement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 03:38 PM
 
5,472 posts, read 3,225,328 times
Reputation: 3935
Quote:
Originally Posted by k350 View Post
Absolute BS. Many whites have been champions of equality since the founding of the US, and were leaders in abolishing slavery and the civil rights movement. Matter of fact, slavery would have not been abolished nor would there have been any equal rights without numerous whites supporting it.

As for the rest of your post, complete BS. You are still making a claim that discrimination is ok, against what equality is all about, then try to justify your bigotry by the statement I quoted above.

If you said socioeconomics, in which blacks make up a disproportionate amount on the lower end, then I would agree with you, but you stated "blacks", meaning regardless of their socioeconomic status, they should be granted not equality, but preferences.


Additionally, you only addressed blacks, but ignore Hispanics who were not subjected to slavery in the US, nor were ever historically in large numbers until recently, mitigating your argument about past injustices as a reason for such affirmative action programs, yet they still flood in here both legally and illegally, so the US and the "evil whites" must not be all that bad.

You also left out Asians, which do have a history in the US of slavery and being indentured servants, yet they as a group excel at academics and socioeconomic status, to the point there is discriminatory policies against them in favor of Hispanics and blacks.

You also left out how on an individual level, does these past injustices impact anyone today? So the black kid that decides to not take school seriously and get poor grades is influenced by slavery how? Especially given the numerous black kids who do get good grades and go on to college? It is just a **** poor excuse for their behavior is all it is. Somehow the decision to engage in dealing drugs is justified by stating their great grandfather lived through Jim Crow laws.

Then you fail to explain despite all these past injustices, why is it blacks are the hardest on each other? The safest place for any black to be is in a white area, not a black one. What do past injustices have to do with the decision today to turn a neighborhood into some crime ridden ghetto?

Read with understanding
, not once did I say anything about there not being white people who championed the abolition of slavery, nor did I say that many whites have not helped many black black people. It is simply about how Affirmative Action Came into being.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,639 posts, read 18,227,675 times
Reputation: 34509
So, even had Scalia been alive, affirmative action would've been upheld. I'm with the dissent on this one. Moreover, with Texas' top 10% program, racial affirmative action isn't needed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,847 posts, read 6,186,733 times
Reputation: 12327
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
So, even had Scalia been alive, affirmative action would've been upheld. I'm with the dissent on this one. Moreover, with Texas' top 10% program, racial affirmative action isn't needed.



Good point. And that's arguably really why the "Top 10% rule" (which I think is actually around the top 8% now actually) was implemented in the first place. To encourage high achieving minority students from any High School in the state to apply, and ideally matriculate, to the UT's and A&M's in the first place and make those University demographics more representative of the state as a whole. It's also been a benefit to students from small, rural schools as well (another population that traditionally did not apply).

Critics have contended it was designed as a back door into an Affirmative Action program because without it, many students from these low performing high schools would not have qualified for admission. Many say that students from low performing schools that get in under the automatic admission have difficulty with the coursework and often need extra help, prep classes etc. I don't know if that's actually true or not. Moreover, the school has had similar programs in place for decades. I'm sure other State's flagship institutions do as well. I was given automatic admission to any state school in the late 80's based on class rank in the top quartile and SAT >1000. Of course, the standards have steadily increased since then.

Last edited by Texas Ag 93; 06-23-2016 at 04:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,248,351 times
Reputation: 8231
Quote:
Originally Posted by mishigas73 View Post
In your opinion, it should be all about academic achievement?
And extra curricular.(awards, sports but listed as generic as possible, clubs, activities) But yes. If you want to avoid any all chances of bias, make every one as generic as possible, and then accept the best or most well rounded students.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,290 posts, read 14,908,083 times
Reputation: 10382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance and Change View Post
Therefore, why can't University simply cut the crap and admit those who apply, American Citizens First, then if there is room then the % allocation for Foreign Students. Someone will still complain, because that too is a quota.
Foreign students pay cash- they don't get scholarships and so they are great for the bottom line. That's why they are so top heavy in American universities. They are also generally better educated (Asian and Swedish students blow Americans out of the water) and better prepared for university work than American students who need so much "remediation".

It's also possible that affirmative action (10-20 years from now) will help whites, who will then be a minority in this country thanks to decades of poor immigration policies including lack of border control and the insane lottery system instead of sensible admitting and vetting as in other civilized countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top