Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus No, they did not refute me on automatic weapons or even the principle of my entire argument.
The rebuttals to my automatic weapons point was, mass killers don't want to use automatic weapons.
But Terrorists DO want automatic weapons when they can get them as seen in Paris and Belgium.
But thankfully to stronger restrictions, automatic weapons are more difficult to get and therefore you don't see as many mass slayings by automatic weapons. Price is not a valid issue because it's not only price that keeps automatics out of civilian hands. Surely, if it was ONLY price, we would see more in public hands and thus more mass shootings with them.
Thus my point being, if regular guns were restricted like automatic weapons, we would see less of those kinds of killings too.
Okay?
So my point remains completely intact and has yet to be properly refuted since I presented it.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
