Why are there so few domestic mass killings by tank? (highway, solution)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And why are there 270 million guns and growing? Because of all this time of being less regulated than other types of gun that are less available.
If you never ban or more regulate them, the supply will never have time to dry up, break down, age and slowly fall in number.
So the very reluctance to increased gun regulation or banning is the very reason there is a massive supply today. And the only way to start dwindling down that supply is increased regulation or banning in the case of assault rifles.
How long has heroine and cocaine been extremely regulated?
It's not more regulated per se, it's availability. People that have them aren't selling them.... Not for anything most can afford.
You think you laid a golden egg of wisdom but this is not a novel idea.
Yes, I do. Because the argument has been that criminals will get these guns despite a ban because they're criminals. So the people opposing my points are arguing back and forth with themselves.
The guns rights people are the ones that said criminals will get the guns they want no matter what laws.
If that's true, you can't say "people that have them aren't selling them"....
If you can stop a criminal shooter by merely refusing to sell your weapon because of low availability, then more regulation or banning can stop that criminal too..
And why are there 270 million guns and growing? Because of all this time of being less regulated than other types of gun that are less available.
If you never ban or more regulate them, the supply will never have time to dry up, break down, age and slowly fall in number.
So the very reluctance to increased gun regulation or banning is the very reason there is a massive supply today. And the only way to start dwindling down that supply is increased regulation or banning in the case of assault rifles.
What makes you think mass shootings and other gun crimes would suddenly stop if you waived a magic wand and made all the semi automatic rifles dissappear?
There will be no significant reduction in the number of guns in America without repeal of the 2nd amendment (which would require approval from 38 out of the 50 states) and door to door Stormtroopers confiscating weapons.
Yes, I do. Because the argument has been that criminals will get these guns despite a ban because they're criminals. So the people opposing my points are arguing back and forth with themselves.
The guns rights people are the ones that said criminals will get the guns they want no matter what laws.
If that's true, you can't say "people that have them aren't selling them"....
If you can stop a criminal shooter by merely refusing to sell your weapon because of low availability, then more regulation or banning can stop that criminal too..
How do you know they are a criminal?
Why isn't more speech and assembly banned? All the inflammatory rhetoric is leading to all this violence! The same with web pages! It leads to radicalization. We must ban them now!
That is ridiculous and you are living in a fantasy world.
To say nothing of Unconstitutional....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
